Skip to main content

Security report for mywhcoleman.com

William H. Coleman, Inc. · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

William H. Coleman, Inc. operates a member login portal primarily serving its clients, likely in the energy sector. The website provides essential member services such as login, sign-up, password recovery, and contact options. The company has an established presence since 2012, supported by a domain registration consistent with its business age and sector. The site is built on ASP.NET Web Forms technology with Bootstrap for styling and includes basic client-side validation and CAPTCHA to enhance security. The technical infrastructure suggests hosting on Microsoft Azure DNS with GoDaddy as the registrar. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA implemented, but lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated Google Analytics script. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms of service linked but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mywhcoleman.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets members and clients requiring secure access to services, indicating a membership-based business model in the energy sector. The website's navigation and content focus on login and account management, suggesting a B2B or B2C service platform. The domain age and registration details support a stable market position. The absence of social media links and limited contact information on the login page suggests a controlled access environment. The company leverages standard web technologies but lacks advanced marketing or tracking tools beyond Google Analytics. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from the site. The business appears focused on secure member services with moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA to mitigate automated login abuse, reflecting a baseline security posture. Input validation is implemented via ASP.NET validators and client-side filtering to prevent injection attacks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing risks. The use of an outdated Google Analytics script may pose minor security and privacy concerns. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with modern best practices and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen browser security.
  3. Upgrade Google Analytics to the latest version (GA4) and review privacy compliance accordingly.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Consider multi-factor authentication for member login to enhance account security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
William H. Coleman, Inc.
Description
William H. Coleman, Inc. appears to be a company serving members with login access, likely in the energy sector given the corporate domain and branding. The site provides member login, sign-up, FAQ, contact, and corporate information.
Key services
Member login portal, Account management, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET Web Forms, JavaScript, Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha1, Google Analytics
Frameworks
ASP.NET, Bootstrap
Platforms
Microsoft IIS (implied by ASP.NET), Azure DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA on login form
  • Input validation with ASP.NET validators
  • Client-side input filtering for username and password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (Universal Analytics - ga.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a member login portal for William H. Coleman, Inc.
  2. No email addresses or phone numbers explicitly listed on login page
  3. Contact form accessible via ContactWhColeman.aspx
  4. Use of CAPTCHA on login form to prevent automated abuse
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  6. Site uses older Google Analytics tracking (ga.js)
  7. No social media links found in HTML content
  8. Site uses ASP.NET Web Forms technology with client-side validation
  9. Domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Azure DNS servers
  10. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms, a mature but older web framework, combined with Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha1 for responsive design. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure with GoDaddy as the registrar. The site uses client-side JavaScript for form validation and Google Analytics for tracking. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage beyond jsdelivr for Bootstrap assets. Accessibility is basic with some input validation but no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta viewport tags but no Open Graph or structured data present. The site is mobile responsive and professionally designed but could benefit from modernization and enhanced technical SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mywhcoleman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mywhcoleman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.