Skip to main content

Security report for mysaucony.cz

Saucony · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mysaucony.cz serves as the official Czech Republic portal for the Saucony brand, specializing in running and lifestyle footwear. It showcases various product lines, provides a store locator, and offers a newsletter subscription, targeting runners and footwear consumers in the Czech market. The business model is retail-focused, leveraging brand marketing and e-commerce capabilities. The site is moderately sized and professionally maintained, with consistent branding and a clear market position as a regional Saucony presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Maps API, and Mailchimp integration. Hosting is via AWS and DigitalOcean Spaces, indicating a reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses common security plugins, but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally managed, with no signs of malicious activity or blocking mechanisms. Strategic improvements could focus on enhancing security headers, publishing incident response details, and expanding direct contact options to improve user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mysaucony.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

mysaucony.cz operates as a regional retail and brand marketing platform for Saucony footwear in the Czech Republic. The company leverages product showcases and store locator tools to drive sales and customer engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content and official brand representation. Revenue streams likely include direct sales through partner stores and online marketing. Target customers are runners and lifestyle footwear consumers. The partnership ecosystem includes hosting providers and marketing tools like Mailchimp. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and active social media presence. The business maintains a medium-sized operation with a focus on brand consistency and customer experience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating potential gaps in security governance. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a retail site but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Add direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and support.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Saucony
Description
The website represents Saucony's Czech market presence, offering running shoes and lifestyle footwear collections such as Endorphin, Ride 18, Guide 18, Omni 9, Hurricane 24, Triumph 22, Xodus Ultra 3, and Originals. It provides product information, store locator, and company background.
Key services
Product showcase, Store locator, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Maps API, Mailchimp for WordPress, Contact Form 7, AddThis, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and cookie consent)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AddThis
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based retail site for Saucony brand in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is professionally presented with product showcases and store locator.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of common marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Mailchimp.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and slick carousel for UI components. It integrates third-party services such as Google Maps API for store location and Mailchimp for newsletter management. Hosting is provided via AWS DNS and DigitalOcean Spaces for media content, ensuring scalable and reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in loading times and accessibility. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data. The site is mobile responsive and uses common marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mysaucony.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mysaucony.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.