Skip to main content

Security report for mypublicinbox.com

Acens Technologies, S.L.U. · Media · Spain

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MyPublicInbox is a Spanish-based online platform launched in 2019 by Acens Technologies, S.L.U., focused on enabling effective communication and networking with public profiles across various cultural and professional sectors. The platform offers services tailored for general users, public profiles, companies, and NGOs, including a marketplace for purchasing communication credits called 'Tempos'. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, supporting multilingual content primarily in Spanish with English alternatives. Technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer lock enabled, but lacks visible incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the business credibility is strong with consistent WHOIS data and clear branding, but privacy and security transparency need improvement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mypublicinbox.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mypublicinbox.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for mypublicinbox.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche social networking and communication platform targeting users interested in connecting with influential public profiles in culture, sports, entertainment, and business. Its business model includes free and paid services, such as profile management and credit purchases. The platform's market presence is supported by a professional website and a related magazine site (mypublicimpact.com). Growth indicators include over 30,000 users and 4,000 public profiles. The company leverages WordPress and Elementor for rapid deployment and content management. Strategic partnerships appear limited but include the magazine site. The platform targets Spanish-speaking users primarily, with English support indicating potential international expansion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protection enabled, indicating good baseline security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, posing legal and reputational risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency, DNS security, and HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning attacks.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update all plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Acens Technologies, S.L.U.
Description
MyPublicInbox is a platform designed to facilitate effective communication with relevant public profiles across culture, sports, cinema, music, television, and various professional, business, and associative fields. It aims to maximize connections and provide value to users' time by enabling collaboration, support, and growth opportunities.
Key services
Communication with public profiles, Public profiles management, Services for users, public profiles, companies, and NGOs, Marketplace for buying 'Tempos' credits
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Elementor 3.27.6, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 5.15.3, MSAL-browser (Microsoft Authentication Library), Google Fonts (Sora, Roboto, Lato, Roboto Slab)
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the visible content
  4. Website uses WordPress with Elementor builder and modern fonts
  5. Multilingual support is implemented with Spanish as primary language and English alternative
  6. No visible security or incident response contact information
  7. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided content
  8. Website branding is consistent and professional
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with Elementor 3.27.6, using modern web fonts and libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome. The hosting provider is Acens Technologies, S.L.U., consistent with the domain registrar. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multilingual content. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but some large images and scripts. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA roles. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks visible analytics or marketing tracking tools, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mypublicinbox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mypublicinbox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.