Skip to main content

Security report for mylpg.eu

myLPG.eu · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

myLPG.eu is an informational platform focused on providing comprehensive data about LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) stations, fuel prices, installers, and related services primarily across Europe. The website targets motorists and vehicle owners interested in LPG fuel alternatives, offering tools such as route planners, savings calculators, and mobile applications for Android and iOS. The platform positions itself as a niche resource with extensive LPG-related data and partnerships with recognized LPG associations, enhancing its credibility within the energy and transportation sectors. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, and the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, but lacks some security headers that could improve its security posture. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and input validation on its contact form. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and cookie consent mechanisms despite using tracking scripts, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is common for informational sites, and does not raise immediate trust concerns. Overall, myLPG.eu presents a professional and trustworthy resource for LPG users with a solid technical foundation but could enhance its privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent, publishing security policies, and considering vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mylpg.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

myLPG.eu operates as a specialized information portal within the LPG and alternative fuels market, targeting European motorists and vehicle owners interested in autogas. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive database of LPG stations, fuel prices, installers, and conversion resources, supported by partnerships with reputable LPG associations. The business model is primarily informational, likely supported by advertising and affiliate links, with additional engagement through mobile apps. The platform's growth indicators include a large number of station confirmations and price updates, reflecting active user participation. The partnership ecosystem with LPG associations and related websites strengthens its market presence and credibility. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand services, improve privacy compliance, and enhance security transparency to maintain and grow user trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and basic input validation on its contact form. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security), published security policies, and incident response contact information. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite using tracking analytics indicates a compliance gap with privacy regulations like GDPR. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, suggesting a low immediate risk. The security culture appears limited to technical controls without formalized policies or transparency. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security posture and reduce potential business risks related to data protection and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of tracking scripts.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a robust security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
myLPG.eu
Description
myLPG.eu helps you find all the autogas stations and installers you need wherever in Europe you are.
Key services
LPG station locator, Fuel price information, Route planner, LPG installers directory, Savings calculator, Mobile apps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Form input validation on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive LPG-related information for Europe and beyond
  2. No WHOIS data available due to privacy protection or query failure
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts
  4. Contact form and email contact provided with validation
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  6. Mobile apps promoted for Android and iOS
  7. Social media presence on Twitter and Facebook
  8. Partners and LPG associations linked prominently
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. Analytics are implemented via Matomo and Google Analytics, providing moderate user tracking capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical improvement. The hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or lightweight setup. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mylpg.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mylpg.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.