Skip to main content

Security report for myli.io

Myli · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Myli is a French SaaS company specializing in AI-powered e-reputation and customer acquisition platforms tailored for multi-location businesses, particularly in the hospitality, retail, and services sectors. The company positions itself as a leader in the French market, trusted by a significant portion of top fast food chains and recognized across various industries. Their platform offers integrated tools such as review management, presence optimization, SEO-optimized store locators, and gamification features to enhance local marketing efforts. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like React and Next.js, ensuring good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. The site loads with moderate performance and employs privacy-respecting analytics (plausible.io). Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly documented, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms. The business credibility is high, supported by client testimonials, partnerships, and consistent branding. Strategically, Myli should enhance its security transparency by publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies and implementing additional security headers. These steps will strengthen trust and compliance, supporting its market leadership and growth ambitions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myli.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Myli operates in a competitive SaaS market focused on reputation and customer acquisition for chains and multi-location businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in AI integration and a comprehensive suite of tools addressing key pain points such as review collection, local SEO, and customer engagement through gamification. The company targets medium-sized businesses with 1 to 200+ locations, evidenced by client logos and case studies. Partnerships with major tech players like Google for Startups and Facebook enhance their ecosystem credibility. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, with growth indicators including expanding client base and product offerings. The company emphasizes quality and agility with a small but impactful team, positioning itself as a trusted partner in digital transformation for local businesses.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible leakage of sensitive information. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for enhancement. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting good data protection practices. The minimal use of tracking and privacy-respecting analytics further supports a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Continue to maintain and update privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  5. Enhance website performance and accessibility to maintain competitive digital maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Myli
Description
Plateforme d'E-réputation et d'Acquisition, pour les chaines d'établissements, perfusée à l'IA et soutenue par une équipe reconnue par la fidélité de nos clients
Key services
Review management, Presence optimization, Store Locator SEO, Lottery gamification
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, SVG
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
plausible.io
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Marketing tools
plausible.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. Content is in French with professional business focus
  3. Strong branding and client references
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable
  6. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  9. Minimal user tracking with privacy-respecting analytics
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging server-side rendering and optimized asset loading. The use of SVG icons and responsive design ensures excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. The site employs plausible.io for analytics, favoring privacy. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset delivery. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate. The technical implementation is robust, supporting a professional and scalable SaaS platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myli.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myli.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.