Skip to main content

Security report for myfreehearttest.com

Cardiometabolic Care Access · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cardiometabolic Care Access operates a comprehensive healthcare screening platform focused on cardiometabolic risk factors such as Lp(a), A1c, and kidney function markers. The organization provides no-cost blood testing across multiple US locations, targeting adults concerned about heart attack risk and related conditions. Their business model integrates clinical testing with research participation, offering stipends and contributing to medical research advancement. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including React and Astro frameworks, supported by extensive analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and privacy policies in place, though improvements can be made in cookie consent and security disclosures. Overall, the platform presents a trustworthy and credible healthcare service with a clear focus on accessibility and research.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myfreehearttest.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized healthcare provider in cardiometabolic screening, leveraging free testing to attract participants and contribute to research. Their competitive advantage lies in offering tests not commonly covered by insurance, such as Lp(a), and providing stipends to encourage participation. The extensive network of clinics across multiple states indicates a medium-sized operation with a broad geographic footprint. Marketing efforts are robust, utilizing multiple ad networks and tracking pixels to reach target audiences. The business targets adults 18+ with potential heart disease risk factors, emphasizing genetic and lifestyle-related health insights. Partnerships appear focused on healthcare and research domains, with parent domain careaccess.com as the main entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, no visible sensitive data exposure, and adherence to privacy policies compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of a visible cookie consent banner and lack of published incident response or security policy pages represent gaps in compliance and transparency. The use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts introduces potential privacy risks, though these are common in healthcare marketing. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for enhancement. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and user privacy controls to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cardiometabolic Care Access
Description
Care Access provides no-cost blood tests to assess risk factors related to heart attack and cardiometabolic health, including Lp(a), A1c, creatinine, and other markers. They operate multiple medical clinics across the US offering testing and research participation opportunities.
Key services
Lp(a) testing, A1c testing, Creatinine/eGFR testing, Lipid panel, hsCRP testing, Additional tests based on eligibility (e.g., pTau)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by ReactForm component), Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, Pinterest Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Azure Application Insights
Frameworks
Astro (static site generator), React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent for personal data processing
  • Use of privacy policy and notice of privacy practices

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Nextdoor, Reddit Ads, Twitter Ads, Pinterest Ads, The Trade Desk
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, Pinterest Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Azure Application Insights
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers free cardiometabolic blood testing with a focus on Lp(a) and related markers.
  2. Multiple US clinic locations are listed with full addresses.
  3. The site uses modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  4. Privacy policy is present and linked; cookie consent mechanism is not visible.
  5. No WHOIS data for the subdomain, consistent with it being a subdomain.
  6. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  7. Good user experience and professional design.
  8. Multiple tracking and advertising pixels present indicating marketing efforts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Astro static site generation and React components, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Integration with Google Maps API and multiple analytics and marketing platforms indicates a sophisticated digital infrastructure. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize load times. Structured data in JSON-LD format is well implemented for organization and clinic locations, aiding SEO. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with minor opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myfreehearttest.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myfreehearttest.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.