Skip to main content

Security report for myfakedude.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MyFakeDude.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in streaming real amateur pornographic videos across various categories and tags. The site targets adult users seeking diverse amateur content and positions itself as a fast-growing portal in this niche. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Fonts, fancyBox, and Slick Slider, with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises significant concerns about domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is poor due to missing privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information is provided. Overall, while the site offers a professional user experience and relevant content, the lack of transparency and domain registration data impacts trust and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myfakedude.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention myfakedude.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for myfakedude.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector, focusing on amateur porn video streaming. Its business model likely relies on advertising and possibly affiliate marketing, as indicated by external partner links and Google Analytics usage. The site offers categorized content, search functionality, and access to pornstars and channels, catering to a broad adult audience. The presence of partner domains suggests some level of ecosystem collaboration. However, the lack of company information, contact details, and registration data limits the ability to assess revenue streams or growth indicators fully. The site appears medium-sized with consistent branding and good content quality.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is used, but no security headers were detected in the provided data. The site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance with regulations like GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is available, reducing readiness for handling security events. The absence of WHOIS data is a major red flag, suggesting potential risks related to domain ownership and legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the site should improve transparency, implement security headers, and provide clear privacy and incident response information to enhance security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to facilitate incident response.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Verify and ensure domain registration data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
MyFakeDude is a portal offering real amateur adult videos featuring various categories and tags, targeting adult audiences interested in amateur pornographic content.
Key services
Streaming of amateur porn videos, Categorized video browsing, Search functionality, Access to pornstars, channels, and tags
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto, Open Sans), jQuery (implied by fancyBox usage), fancyBox v2.1.5, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL and favicon links using https

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content portal specializing in amateur porn videos.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or WHOIS privacy blocking.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. Uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Site is mobile optimized and has good navigation and content structure.
  8. No social media links or official company information present.
  9. No security or incident response policies visible.
  10. Site includes RTA rating meta tags indicating adult content classification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries including fancyBox and Slick Slider for UI components. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images implemented. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating room for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a good user experience but requires enhancements in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myfakedude.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myfakedude.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.