Skip to main content

Security report for mybaltichome.com

My Baltic Home · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

My Baltic Home is a small hospitality business specializing in holiday house and apartment rentals at the Baltic Sea in Latvia. Founded in 2023, it targets families and friends seeking vacation accommodations near Riga airport. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Kadence theme, integrating Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business claims. The site content is safe and professional, suitable for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mybaltichome.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on vacation rentals in a niche Baltic Sea market. Its business model is direct rental services, likely generating revenue from bookings. The website shows consistent branding and provides clear contact information, including email, phone, and physical address in Latvia. The presence of social media (Facebook) indicates engagement with customers. The company is small and newly founded, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The use of structured data and SEO tools suggests an intent to grow visibility and market reach. No certifications or trust badges were found, which could be an area for future enhancement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service pages is a notable compliance gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site lacks some recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response contacts are not provided, which could delay handling of security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file with incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
My Baltic Home
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
My Baltic Home
Description
Ferienhaus und Ferienwohnung an der Ostsee in Lettland - Wohlfühlurlaub für Familie und Freunde! Nur 60 km vom Flughafen Riga.
Key services
Holiday house rentals, Holiday apartment rentals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Kadence Theme, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Rank Math SEO
Frameworks
Schema.org structured data
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for holiday rentals in Latvia.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user controls in German, English, and Latvian.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Contact information including email and phone number is clearly provided.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and Google Analytics is used with consent denied by default until user opt-in.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor page builder and Kadence theme, supported by plugins like Rank Math for SEO and Cookiebot for cookie management. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. Hosting appears to be managed by Cronon GmbH, consistent with the registrar information. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in caching and resource optimization. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mybaltichome.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mybaltichome.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.