Skip to main content

Security report for muzeumkarlazemana.cz

Muzeum Karla Zemana · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muzeum Karla Zemana is a specialized cultural and educational institution dedicated to showcasing the life and work of the renowned Czech filmmaker Karel Zeman. The museum offers interactive exhibitions, workshops on animation and film techniques, and an e-commerce platform for related merchandise. It targets families, children, and film enthusiasts, positioning itself as a niche museum with a strong cultural heritage focus. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries and plugins, ensuring a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks some advanced HTTP security headers and explicit incident response policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, with active social media engagement and clear contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching muzeumkarlazemana.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention muzeumkarlazemana.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for muzeumkarlazemana.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates primarily in the hospitality and education sectors, leveraging its unique cultural content to attract visitors and learners. Its business model includes ticket sales, educational programs, workshops, and an online shop. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and longevity of the institution. The museum maintains a consistent brand image and uses multiple social media channels to engage its audience. While it does not disclose detailed business registration or certifications on the site, the presence of structured data and verified social accounts enhances credibility. Partnerships include an English version of the site and a dedicated e-shop domain.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party tracking pixels (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel) is balanced with user consent mechanisms. Regular updates of WordPress and plugins are implied but should be verified to prevent vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated terms of service page and more detailed business registration information to boost trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muzeum Karla Zemana
Description
Interaktivní expozice filmového muzea představující celoživotní dílo světově uznávaného filmového tvůrce Karla Zemana a jeho filmové triky, které proslavily českou kinematografii 20. století.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Workshops and courses on animation and film tricks, E-shop for museum-related products, Guided tours and special programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.4, jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR plugin, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained cultural museum site focused on Karel Zeman's film legacy.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. Active social media presence across multiple platforms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No explicit privacy or security policy beyond cookie and privacy policy found.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with a well-structured theme and multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Owl Carousel, and FontAwesome for UI components. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Cookie consent is managed by Complianz GDPR plugin, ensuring compliance with EU regulations. Hosting and domain registration are managed by WEDOS, a reputable Czech provider. Performance is moderate with preloading animations and optimized images, though some scripts and styles could be further optimized for speed. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with muzeumkarlazemana.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muzeumkarlazemana.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.