Skip to main content

Security report for muuna.lv

Angern · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muuna.lv is a professionally developed real estate project website representing the Muuna residential development in Mārupe, Latvia. The site is operated by Angern, a real estate developer, and showcases a multi-phase housing project with detailed descriptions, galleries, and contact information. The business targets local Latvian home buyers seeking modern, community-oriented living spaces. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies including WordPress CMS, Bootstrap framework, and integrated marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-branded, and user-friendly, supporting the business's market positioning as a quality residential developer in the region.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching muuna.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate sector focusing on residential development in Mārupe, Latvia. It leverages partnerships with architects (Ruume) and web developers (Ozols Ir) to deliver a comprehensive project experience. The business model centers on phased apartment sales with a strong emphasis on community and lifestyle. The presence of multiple banking partners indicates financing options for buyers. The company maintains active social media channels to engage potential customers. The website content and structure reflect a strategic approach to market positioning, targeting discerning local buyers interested in quality housing. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but does not detract from the professional business presentation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses secure form plugins with validation to protect user input. Tracking and marketing scripts are standard and do not expose sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are not present, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional best practices implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Angern
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Angern
Description
Sapņu mājas Mārupes sirdī. Iedvesmojoša vieta, kur justies kā privātmājā. Muuna ir jaunais Mārupes klusais centrs. Projekts tiks realizēts 5 kārtās.
Key services
Residential apartment sales, Real estate development, Community living environment
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Forminator plugin, WP Smush Pro
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Forminator plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed real estate project site for Muuna in Mārupe, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local buyers.
  3. Multiple image galleries and project descriptions enhance user engagement.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with named marketing manager.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram is linked.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices observed.
  7. No visible security or privacy policy gaps detected on the site.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The Forminator plugin is used for secure form handling with client-side validation. WP Smush Pro optimizes images for performance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and deferred scripts. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience with opportunities for further security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with muuna.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muuna.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.