Skip to main content

Security report for murinselgraz.at

Murinsel · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Murinsel Graz is a small hospitality business operating a café located on an island in Graz, Austria. The website provides information about café opening hours, events, and the unique location offering views of the Mur river and Graz old town. The business targets tourists and local visitors seeking leisure and cultural experiences. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins for event management and content display, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with a GDPR-compliant privacy policy and cookie banner. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, suitable for its hospitality business purpose.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of murinselgraz.at. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching murinselgraz.at

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Murinsel Graz positions itself as a local attraction and café with event hosting capabilities, leveraging its unique island location in the city center. The business model focuses on hospitality services and cultural events, appealing to tourists and residents. The website's integration with social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram supports community engagement and marketing efforts. The absence of detailed business registration or VAT information suggests a small-scale operation. The use of WordPress and popular plugins indicates reliance on standard web technologies without custom enterprise solutions. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The business appears stable with consistent branding and content quality.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency in security management. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to ensure ongoing compliance and protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Murinsel
Description
Murinsel is a hospitality business offering a café located on an island in Graz, Austria. It provides a leisure experience with views of the Mur river and Graz old town, hosting events and serving visitors from Tuesday to Sunday.
Key services
Café services, Event hosting, Tourist attraction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, EventON plugin, Photoswipe, SiteOrigin Panels, Cookie Notice plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
bits.at
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
bits.at
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site for Murinsel café in Graz, Austria.
  2. Content is in German with English alternate language available.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented and GDPR privacy policy is linked.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form available on contact page.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with no visible mixed content.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data; recommended to add.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with plugins such as EventON for event management, Photoswipe for image galleries, SiteOrigin Panels for layout, and Cookie Notice for GDPR compliance. It uses jQuery and Typekit fonts for UI enhancements. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs like netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and uses a privacy-respecting analytics service (bits.at). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features like skip links. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The absence of advanced security headers and limited metadata suggests room for technical improvements. Overall, the infrastructure is standard for a small hospitality website with potential for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with murinselgraz.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review murinselgraz.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.