Skip to main content

Security report for munck.dk

Munck · Energy · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Munck is a well-established Danish nationwide construction and infrastructure group specializing in road construction, district heating, sewer networks, electrical and fiber networks, unique construction projects, and harbor facilities. The company targets business and public sector clients within Denmark, leveraging over 25 years of domain presence and experience. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business focus. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, incorporating modern web technologies and cookie consent management via Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent management but lacks explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, Munck presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its business operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching munck.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Munck holds a strong market position as a large-scale infrastructure and construction service provider in Denmark, serving sectors such as energy and transportation. Their business model focuses on B2B and B2G engagements, offering specialized services in critical infrastructure projects. The company benefits from a long domain history, consistent branding, and integration with trusted third-party services like Google and Cookiebot. While no explicit certifications or partnerships were identified in the content, the presence of structured data and cookie compliance indicates a mature digital strategy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers in the analyzed content suggests reliance on contact forms for client engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a robust cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The domain's WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, with no privacy protection masking registrant details. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, implementing additional HTTP headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Munck
Description
Vi udfører sikre veje, driftssikker fjernvarme, fremtidssikret kloaknet, el- og fibernet, unikke anlægsarbejder og effektive havneanlæg.
Key services
Road construction, District heating, Sewer networks, Electrical and fiber networks, Unique construction works, Harbor facilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Google Analytics (implied via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern CMS and builder (WordPress + Elementor).
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML snippet; contact form present.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
  7. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Elementor page builder, utilizing jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as YouTube, Google, and jsDelivr. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, and mobile responsiveness is good. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata effectively for SEO and social sharing. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which should be addressed to strengthen the overall security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with munck.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review munck.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.