Skip to main content

Security report for multiplesklerose-ooe.at

Oberösterreichische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft · Healthcare · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Oberösterreichische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft website serves as a regional non-profit platform dedicated to supporting individuals affected by Multiple Sclerosis in Upper Austria. The organization provides various services including counseling, financial support, regional groups, events, and specialized programs for newly diagnosed and young patients. The website reflects a clear mission to assist and inform its target audience with relevant and accessible content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages modern libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Cookie consent is managed professionally via Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with GDPR requirements. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses anonymized Google Analytics tracking, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a solid security posture. However, there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and aligned with its non-profit healthcare mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching multiplesklerose-ooe.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates within the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on Multiple Sclerosis support in Austria. Its business model centers on community support and information dissemination rather than commercial revenue. The website's market position is regional and specialized, targeting patients, families, and caregivers. The presence of structured navigation and service offerings suggests a mature operational approach. The use of Cookiebot and Google Analytics indicates an awareness of digital compliance and user experience optimization. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the domain or website content. The organization appears to maintain a focused and consistent brand identity, with trust signals such as GDPR compliance and clear contact channels enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via a reputable third-party service. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reducing privacy risks. Security headers are likely present, though explicit details are not fully confirmed in the HTML snippet. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational website but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Add incident response contact information or abuse email to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Expand SEO metadata and structured data to improve search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oberösterreichische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
Description
Ein Leben mit der Krankheit MS bringt viel Veränderung, Ungewissheit und offene Fragen. Wir sind für Sie da!
Key services
Beratung und finanzielle Unterstützung, Regionalgruppen, Veranstaltungen, MS-Gespräche, Neu- und Jungerkrankte Unterstützung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, SweetAlert2, Magnific Popup, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  6. Uses standard and reputable external libraries and CDNs
  7. Google Analytics configured with IP anonymization
  8. No evidence of privacy or security policy gaps
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, SweetAlert2, and Magnific Popup. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot, integrating well with GDPR compliance. The site uses multiple CDN providers for performance optimization. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with moderate performance characteristics. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is functional but lacks extensive keyword metadata. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively with opportunities for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with multiplesklerose-ooe.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review multiplesklerose-ooe.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.