Skip to main content

Security report for mujsvet-pg.cz

Procter & Gamble · Retail · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Můj svět P&G' serves as a localized consumer engagement platform for Procter & Gamble in the Czech and Slovak markets. It provides product information, promotional campaigns, contests, cashback offers, and community features tailored to regional consumers. The site reflects a strong market position of P&G as a leading multinational consumer goods company, focusing on brand marketing and customer interaction. Technically, the site is built on a modern stack including React and Sitecore CMS, hosted on Microsoft Azure, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. Security posture is robust with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Privacy compliance is well addressed through links to official P&G privacy and terms pages and a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mujsvet-pg.cz

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets consumers in the Czech Republic and Slovakia interested in P&G's broad portfolio of household and personal care products. Its business model centers on brand promotion, consumer loyalty programs, and interactive marketing campaigns. The presence of multiple official P&G domains and consistent branding indicates a well-integrated partnership ecosystem. The site supports growth through active engagement tools like contests and cashback, appealing to family-oriented demographics. While direct contact details are limited, the external consumer support link provides a channel for customer service. The platform's digital maturity is high, leveraging advanced CMS and analytics tools to optimize user experience and marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. The use of cookie consent aligns with GDPR requirements, and external links to official privacy and terms pages reinforce compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response information limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are presented. The site does not expose any suspicious or malicious content, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with access. Overall, the security measures are appropriate for a consumer-facing marketing site but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance contact information availability with verified company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating security headers and privacy compliance to maintain high standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Procter & Gamble
Description
Website for Procter & Gamble brands in Czech and Slovak markets offering product information, contests, cashback, and community engagement.
Key services
Product information, Promotions and contests, Cashback and rewards, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Sitecore JSS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
React, Sitecore
Platforms
Azure
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Bazaarvoice
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Bazaarvoice
Marketing tools
Bazaarvoice, Segmanta
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and localized for Czech and Slovak markets.
  3. Strong use of official Procter & Gamble branding and domains.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages; contact is via external consumer support link.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with external official P&G policies linked.
  7. Modern technology stack with React and Sitecore CMS.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Sitecore JSS, indicating a modern and scalable front-end and CMS solution. Hosting on Microsoft Azure provides reliable infrastructure and performance. The site uses multiple responsive images and CSS chunks for optimized loading across devices. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Bazaarvoice, and Segmanta are integrated for data-driven marketing. Accessibility and SEO are well considered with proper meta tags, structured data (JSON-LD), and language attributes. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The site is well-structured, performant, and mobile-optimized, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mujsvet-pg.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mujsvet-pg.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.