Skip to main content

Security report for mstourism.cz

Moravian-Silesian Tourism, s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moravian-Silesian Tourism, s.r.o. operates as a regional destination management organization focused on promoting tourism in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic. The company collaborates with various partners and projects to enhance sustainable tourism and position the region as an attractive destination for leisure and holidays. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at tourists and stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and employs a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via the Complianz plugin. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management, but lacks advanced security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness somewhat, but the presence of multiple reputable partner links and consistent branding supports legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a moderate to good security posture and a professional digital presence suitable for its business purpose. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response disclosure, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mstourism.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds an important role in the hospitality and government sectors as a regional tourism promoter. Its business model centers on destination management, project coordination, and media relations to boost tourism in Moravian-Silesian. The website indicates a medium-sized organization with a broad partnership ecosystem including regional authorities and tourism projects. The lack of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a focus on public information dissemination rather than direct sales or customer service. The company leverages digital marketing tools and maintains a consistent brand image, positioning itself as a key regional tourism authority with growth potential through partnerships and project initiatives.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and GDPR cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The absence of WHOIS data is a transparency concern but may be due to privacy protection. No visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public-facing tourism site but could be improved to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Moravian-Silesian Tourism, s.r.o.
Description
Moravian-Silesian Tourism is a destination company focused on the development of tourism in the Moravian-Silesian region. It collaborates with professional partners to achieve sustainable tourism goals and promotes the region as an ideal place for holidays and leisure.
Key services
Tourism promotion, Project and activity coordination, Media and public relations, Partner collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR plugin, SimpleLightbox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Site uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and GDPR compliance.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with opt-in mechanism.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook and Instagram links.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response pages found.
  8. Site content is professionally presented and relevant to regional tourism.
  9. Multiple external partner domains linked, indicating a broad partnership network.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics tracking. The Complianz GDPR plugin manages cookie consent with an opt-in mechanism, reflecting good privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations, and mobile responsiveness is good. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers are missing, which is a technical gap. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional tourism website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mstourism.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mstourism.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.