Skip to main content

Security report for msonic.lv

msonic Baltic Latvia · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

msonic Baltic Latvia is a specialized distributor and retailer of professional audio equipment, serving the Baltic region with a focus on premium brands and studio/live sound gear. The company operates both physical demo studios and an e-commerce platform (linked shop.msonic.ee), targeting professional audio users and enthusiasts. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides relevant content including news, promotions, and brand information. Technically, the site uses the Flockler platform with integrations for Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter widgets, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from improved privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching msonic.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche market position as a regional distributor of high-end audio equipment, leveraging partnerships with well-known brands. Its business model combines retail sales, training seminars, and demo services, catering to a specialized audience. The presence of multiple brand pages and promotional campaigns suggests active marketing and customer engagement. The linked e-commerce domain indicates a multi-channel sales approach. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements. The company maintains social media channels on Facebook and Instagram, supporting brand visibility and customer interaction.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses common tracking technologies but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of contact emails or phone numbers reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear company contact emails and phone numbers on the website for transparency and trust.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
msonic Baltic Latvia
Description
msonic Baltic specializes in distribution of high-quality professional audio equipment from top brands, including microphones, speakers, and related studio and live sound gear.
Key services
Distribution of professional audio equipment, Demo studio services, Training and seminars, E-commerce sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Widgets, WebFont Loader, Flockler CMS/Platform
Frameworks
Madrid (Flockler customization)
Platforms
Flockler
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple articles.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided, only physical address.
  4. Uses multiple tracking and marketing scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. Content is professional and safe with no adult or questionable material.
  8. Website uses Flockler platform and Madrid framework for content management.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook and Instagram links in footer.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Flockler platform using the Madrid framework, with integration of Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter widgets. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize speed. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with msonic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review msonic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.