Skip to main content

Security report for msdprivacy.com

Merck & Co., Inc. · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.msdprivacy.com serves as a global privacy statement portal for Merck & Co., Inc., known as MSD outside the U.S. and Canada. It provides comprehensive privacy statements tailored by region and language, reflecting the company's commitment to data privacy and compliance. The site is professionally designed, accessible, and optimized for SEO, leveraging WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The presence of a cookie consent banner and external link warnings demonstrate attention to user privacy and security. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and includes accessibility features, but lacks explicit security headers and visible incident response contacts. The SSL configuration is excellent, ensuring secure communications. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy or privacy protection, which is inconsistent with the otherwise professional presentation. Security posture is good but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing vulnerability disclosure information. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its purpose well, but domain registration transparency and enhanced security disclosures would strengthen trust further. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure details, and clarifying domain registration information to align with corporate transparency standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching msdprivacy.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Merck & Co., Inc. is a large multinational healthcare and pharmaceutical company with a global presence. The website targets a worldwide audience, providing localized privacy statements to comply with regional regulations such as GDPR. The business model focuses on pharmaceutical products and healthcare services, with a strong emphasis on regulatory compliance and corporate responsibility. The privacy portal supports the company's reputation and legal compliance, reinforcing trust with customers and partners. The presence of subsidiaries like Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Intervet, Inc. indicates a complex corporate structure. The company leverages partnerships for accessibility and privacy certifications, enhancing its corporate image and compliance posture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for enterprise security transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional security standards and improving transparency around incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Clarify domain registration details to improve transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Continue to maintain and update cookie consent mechanisms and privacy compliance measures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Merck & Co., Inc.
Description
Merck & Co., Inc., known as MSD outside the U.S. and Canada, established a Privacy Office in 2001 to oversee a global privacy program for its worldwide operations. The site provides privacy statements tailored by region and language.
Key services
Global privacy program, Privacy statements by region
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, OneTrust Consent Management, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • External link warning modal

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a corporate privacy statement portal for Merck & Co., Inc. (MSD).
  2. Content is comprehensive and localized by region and language.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via OneTrust.
  5. External links to official Merck domains trigger a modal warning.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual for a corporate site.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  9. Site uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager.
  10. Accessibility commitment is demonstrated via link to Level Access.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, and OneTrust manages cookie consent, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good performance metrics. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses external CDNs for cookie law scripts and analytics, which is standard practice. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with msdprivacy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review msdprivacy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.