Skip to main content

Security report for msdinsight.se

MSD Sverige · Healthcare · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MSDinsight.se is a professional healthcare portal operated by MSD Sverige, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for healthcare professionals in Sweden, offering therapy-focused information, product details, patient information, and educational webinars. The site is well-branded with MSD's official logos and maintains a consistent presence across multiple social media platforms, reinforcing its market position as a trusted pharmaceutical information provider. Technically, the website is built on WordPress VIP with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. Performance is moderate, with no significant technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs multiple security headers, and integrates a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. However, the absence of explicit security policy pages and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. The main concern is the lack of WHOIS data for the domain www.msdinsight.se, which may warrant further investigation to confirm domain registration legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing contact information visibility, publishing security policies, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to sustain security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching msdinsight.se

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MSD Sverige operates MSDinsight.se as a specialized B2B portal targeting healthcare professionals in Sweden. The business model focuses on providing up-to-date therapeutic and product information, patient resources, and professional education, supporting MSD's pharmaceutical sales and marketing efforts. The portal leverages MSD's global brand strength and local market knowledge to maintain a competitive edge. The integration of webinars and educational content indicates a strategy to engage and retain healthcare professionals as key stakeholders. The website's linkage to MSD's main corporate domains and social media channels reflects a well-established partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active content updates and user engagement features. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, likely managed through authenticated user access.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive set of security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. The presence of a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates adherence to data protection regulations. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party services like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust is managed appropriately. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, which are best practices for enterprise sites. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by publishing explicit security governance documentation and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance visibility of company contact information to improve trust and user support.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MSD Sverige
Description
Portal för hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal i Sverige. Terapiinriktad information, senaste nytt om läkemedel, patientinformation samt beställning av material.
Key services
Therapeutic area information, Product information, Patient information, Material ordering, Webinars and education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, jQuery, Pikaday (date picker), Brightcove (video), MConnect theme and plugins
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WP VIP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare portal targeting Swedish healthcare professionals.
  2. Content is therapy and product focused with educational resources and webinars.
  3. Strong MSD branding and social media presence.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage.
  6. WHOIS data for the domain is missing, raising questions about domain registration status.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
  8. Use of modern WordPress VIP hosting and advanced theme/plugins.
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust WordPress VIP platform with a custom MConnect theme and multiple specialized plugins for content management, user authentication, and interactive features. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, SEO optimization via Yoast, and compliance tools like OneTrust for cookie management. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features consistent with WCAG guidelines, as evidenced by linked Level Access certification. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party scripts and the need for continuous monitoring of plugin updates. The absence of hosting provider details limits full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with msdinsight.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review msdinsight.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.