Skip to main content

Security report for mschf.xyz

MSCHF · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MSCHF is a creative entity focused on producing culturally impactful projects and limited edition products that blend art, internet culture, and streetwear. The company positions itself as a cultural innovator competing with major corporations and media entities. Their business model revolves around creative projects, product drops, and cultural commentary, targeting a niche audience interested in internet culture and art. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and TailwindCSS, with integrations for multiple analytics and advertising platforms. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some accessibility features and explicit privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business credibility. Recommendations include improving privacy compliance, adding security headers, and publishing security policies to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mschf.xyz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mschf.xyz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mschf.xyz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MSCHF operates in the media sector with a focus on creative cultural projects and e-commerce sales of limited edition products. Their market positioning is that of a niche disruptor with a strong internet presence and cultural influence. Revenue streams likely include product sales via their store and collaborations. The target customer segment includes internet culture enthusiasts and art consumers. The company shows growth through continuous project releases and maintains a broad partnership ecosystem evident from numerous linked domains. Strategic observations suggest a focus on brand identity and cultural relevance rather than traditional corporate structure or large-scale enterprise operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party tracking pixels increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears informal and could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security contact information.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MSCHF
Description
MSCHF, as a practice and as an entity, manifests the ambition for creative work / a creative entity to wield power (in culture; on the world stage) competitive with the cultural power held by global corporations, celebrities, and media entities.
Key services
Creative projects and art installations, Limited edition product sales, Cultural commentary and media
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TailwindCSS, Nuxt.js, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Snapchat Pixel
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Use of security-related scripts (e.g., TikTok, Facebook, Twitter pixels)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Twitter Analytics, Snapchat Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Google
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Snapchat Pixel
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising pixels.
  4. No direct contact information or forms found on the main page.
  5. Website content is focused on creative projects and cultural products.
  6. Domain registration and technical setup appear legitimate and consistent.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No security headers explicitly detected in provided data.
  9. Mobile optimization and SEO are good based on meta tags and responsive design.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Nuxt.js and TailwindCSS, providing a responsive and visually consistent user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via reputable providers (Amazon Registrar and Cloudflare). Performance is moderate with preloading and module preloading techniques used. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site integrates multiple analytics and advertising scripts, which may impact performance and privacy. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mschf.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mschf.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.