Skip to main content

Security report for mrporn.xxx

Registrant of mrporn.xxx · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MRPORN.XXX is a niche adult content review website that has been operational since 2021. The site primarily serves as a landing page redirecting users to its successor domain MRPORNSITES.NET, where updated and new porn site reviews are hosted. The business model focuses on providing curated reviews and referral links to adult entertainment platforms, targeting adults aged 18 and over. The site maintains a basic web presence with minimal content and limited business transparency. Technically, the website is built with simple HTML and CSS, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS services but lacking DNSSEC and visible HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. The site shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with no evident tracking or analytics scripts embedded. From a security perspective, the site has minimal protections. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or privacy and cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, and no forms exist to assess secure data handling. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected but provides only generic registrant information, limiting trust signals. Overall, the website presents a low security posture and limited privacy compliance, with basic content quality and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security, privacy policies, and transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mrporn.xxx

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MRPORN.XXX operates in the adult media sector as a content review and referral platform. Its market positioning is niche and transitional, moving users to a newer domain for updated content. The business model relies on affiliate and referral traffic from curated porn site reviews. The target audience is adult consumers seeking reliable adult content recommendations. The site maintains partnerships with multiple adult content related domains, indicating a networked ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal content and lack of detailed business information. The company appears small and focused on content aggregation rather than direct content production or sales.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of MRPORN.XXX is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy policies exposes the site to potential risks including data interception and lack of user privacy protections. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating limited preparedness for security events. The domain registration is transparent but generic, which may reduce trust. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations are evident due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing some risk, but also limits engagement and trust. Overall, the security culture appears minimal and reactive rather than proactive.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve incident response readiness and user trust.
  5. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Registrant of mrporn.xxx
Description
MRPORN.XXX was here for some time and brought to you best porn site reviews. It is now redirecting users to its successor site MRPORNSITES.NET where updated and new reviews are available. The site focuses on adult content reviews with features like searching, filtering, and sorting by price, rating, and popularity.
Key services
Porn site reviews, Search and filtering of adult sites, Referral links to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple landing page redirecting users to a successor site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No HTTPS status provided; assumed missing or unknown.
  7. Content is minimal and basic with adult content warnings.
  8. Multiple external partner links to adult content related sites.
  9. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts found in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS without advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting details are limited but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site lacks embedded analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. No forms or interactive elements are detected, limiting data input risks but also user engagement. The technical implementation is simple and functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations to support business growth and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mrporn.xxx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mrporn.xxx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.