Skip to main content

Security report for mrpinks.com

Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews operates as a niche adult media review website, providing detailed and trusted reviews of pornographic websites and services. The site targets adult consumers seeking honest evaluations and discount offers for premium adult content. Its business model relies heavily on affiliate marketing, linking users to partner porn sites with subscription offers. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.2, Google Analytics for tracking, and standard HTML/CSS with responsive design elements. While the site is accessible and well-structured, it lacks modern security headers and uses outdated libraries, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS registration data, raises concerns about compliance and domain legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mrpinks.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a solid position within the adult entertainment review niche, leveraging over two decades of claimed operational history to build brand recognition. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive reviews and affiliate partnerships with major adult content providers. Revenue streams are primarily affiliate commissions from referred subscriptions. The target audience is adult consumers interested in premium porn content and discounts. The partnership ecosystem includes several well-known adult sites, indicating a robust affiliate network. However, the lack of transparent business registration and contact details may limit trust among discerning users. Strategic growth could focus on enhancing compliance, security, and direct user engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but shows gaps that could impact business operations. HTTPS is enforced, but no advanced security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are detected, increasing risk of common web attacks. The use of outdated jQuery 1.11.2 is a notable vulnerability vector. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, suggesting limited preparedness for security incidents. The site should prioritize upgrading libraries, implementing security headers, and establishing privacy policies to improve its security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement modern security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Establish clear contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Conduct a full security audit and implement an incident response plan to prepare for potential security events.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews
Description
Mr. Pink's Porn Reviews is a trusted porn review site providing honest adult site reviews, discount porn offers, and information about the best porn sites. The site has been online for over 21 years.
Key services
Porn site reviews, Discount porn offers, Affiliate referrals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.2, Google Analytics, Fancybox, Google Plus One (deprecated)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by og:url https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Plus One (deprecated)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected on main site.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact form link.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a commercial site.
  6. Affiliate marketing is a core business model.
  7. Site content is adult-oriented with extensive porn site reviews.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  9. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including jQuery 1.11.2 and Fancybox for UI elements. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive with viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. However, the use of deprecated Google Plus One scripts and outdated jQuery indicates technical debt. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization techniques detected. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks visible. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but could be enhanced with structured data markup. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mrpinks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mrpinks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.