Skip to main content

Security report for movingtrafficmedia.com

Moving Traffic Media · Media · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moving Traffic Media is a professional digital marketing agency based in Westchester, NY, specializing in SEO, paid media, social media marketing, and AI-powered content solutions. The company targets enterprise and mid-market organizations seeking to amplify their brand authority, traffic, and conversions through data-driven campaigns. Their market position is supported by client testimonials, certifications such as Google Partner and BBB accreditation, and a comprehensive service portfolio. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme and uses modern marketing tools like Gravity Forms and Google Tag Manager. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS significantly weaken the security posture. Security headers are minimal but some best practices like Content-Security-Policy are present. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy found but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility and content quality but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching movingtrafficmedia.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the digital marketing and media sector, offering essential services such as SEO, PPC, social media, display, and marketplace advertising. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on integrated digital marketing strategies for a diverse client base across various verticals including real estate, retail, manufacturing, technology, and financial services. The presence of client logos and testimonials indicates a solid reputation and trust within the market. Partnerships such as with the Page 2 Podcast suggest active engagement in content marketing and thought leadership. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools to optimize campaign performance and client reporting. Growth indicators include a regularly updated blog with industry insights and a newsletter signup, supporting ongoing client engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception risks. The website uses Cloudflare as a CDN but does not leverage its full security capabilities such as TLS enforcement or HSTS. Security headers are limited, and important email security measures like DMARC are missing. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Forms are protected by CAPTCHA, reducing spam risk, but overall data protection and compliance measures appear minimal. The absence of cookie consent and GDPR compliance indicators further highlight privacy risks. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications and align with industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Implement DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records to improve email security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policies to reflect GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Referrer-Policy.
  6. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  7. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It employs Gravity Forms for data collection and integrates Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. Hosting is provided by WP Engine, a managed WordPress hosting provider, and Cloudflare is used as a CDN. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization using Yoast SEO plugin. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and the lack of HTTPS is a major technical deficiency. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous script loading to optimize user experience. There is room for improvement in accessibility and performance monitoring to ensure compliance with best practices and user expectations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with movingtrafficmedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review movingtrafficmedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.