Skip to main content

Security report for movilaesweb.com

CODITY LLC · Energy · El Salvador

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website movilaesweb.com serves as an online portal for AES El Salvador, focusing on providing customers with services related to electricity bill payments, outage reporting, and general information about AES El Salvador's energy services. The business appears to be a small-scale service portal operated or developed by CODITY LLC, targeting customers in El Salvador. The site uses modern web technologies such as React and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. However, the website suffers from significant security shortcomings, most notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which severely undermines user trust and data security. Additionally, the lack of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information further detracts from compliance and user confidence. Overall, the site is functional but basic in content quality and technical implementation, with critical security improvements needed to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching movilaesweb.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal targets the energy sector, specifically customers of AES El Salvador, providing essential utility-related services online. The business model revolves around facilitating customer interactions with the utility provider through digital means, likely generating value by improving customer service efficiency. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or partnerships limits the ability to fully assess market positioning or revenue streams. The use of third-party scripts like agentbot.net suggests some level of customer engagement or marketing efforts, though transparency is limited. The company behind the site, CODITY LLC, appears to be a small entity focused on this niche service. Growth potential exists if security and compliance gaps are addressed, enabling trust and broader adoption.

Security posture

The security posture of movilaesweb.com is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential interception and data tampering. The lack of security headers and DNS security features such as DNSSEC and DMARC further increases risk. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating immature security governance. While no active vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, the foundational security controls are missing. This exposes the business to reputational damage and regulatory non-compliance, especially under GDPR or similar frameworks. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and implementation of security best practices is critical to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance considerations and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Add contact information and customer support channels to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Configure DNS security features such as DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records to protect domain integrity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, served from AWS infrastructure, and loads external resources such as Google Fonts and a third-party script from agentbot.net. The HTML is valid but minimal, with no forms or interactive elements detected on the homepage. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the lack of optimization hints at slow loading times. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tags present but no advanced accessibility features. SEO is minimally addressed through meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The absence of SSL and security headers represents a significant technical debt and risk. Modernization efforts should focus on security hardening, performance optimization, and enhanced user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with movilaesweb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review movilaesweb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.