Skip to main content

Security report for mousehouse.cz

Mousehouse s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mousehouse s.r.o. is a small marketing and communication studio based in Prague, Czech Republic, specializing in product development, analysis, tailored solutions, and marketing services for brands, startups, companies, and institutions. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and team information, targeting businesses seeking marketing and communication expertise. Technically, the site uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery and Google Analytics, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure form validation, but lacks security headers and privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not significantly detract from the site's legitimacy given the professional content and contact information. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and safe, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mousehouse.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mousehouse.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mousehouse operates in the media sector as a marketing and communication agency, focusing on bespoke services such as product positioning, in-depth analysis, creative solutions, and marketing strategy. Their business model revolves around service provision to a diverse client base including startups, NGOs, and corporate clients. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a local market focus in Prague. The website indicates a clear branding strategy and professional presentation, though no explicit revenue or partnership data is available. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager suggests an interest in digital marketing effectiveness. Lack of privacy and cookie policies may impact client trust and regulatory compliance. No related or partner domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The contact form includes client-side validation but no visible advanced security controls like CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mousehouse s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mousehouse s.r.o.
Description
Komunikační a marketingové studio zaměřené na produkt, analýzu, řešení a marketing pro značky, start-upy, firmy a instituce.
Key services
Produkt, Analýza, Řešení, Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, mod_pagespeed
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • secure form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  5. Website uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Content is professional and relevant to marketing and communication services.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional but stable technology stack including jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The presence of mod_pagespeed indicates some performance optimization efforts. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. However, the use of an older jQuery version may pose security risks if not properly maintained. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the source. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and SEO metadata completeness. Accessibility is basic, lacking advanced ARIA roles or landmarks. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small marketing studio but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mousehouse.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mousehouse.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.