Skip to main content

Security report for mou.cz

Masarykův onkologický ústav · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Masarykův onkologický ústav (MOÚ) is a leading oncology institute based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in cancer treatment, diagnostics, research, and education. Established in 1935, it holds a prominent position in the Czech healthcare sector, accredited by the Organization of European Cancer Institutes (OECI). The website reflects a comprehensive healthcare service provider targeting patients, medical professionals, and visitors, offering detailed information on preventive programs, clinical studies, and patient care services. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and the Nette Framework, ensuring good mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO optimization. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Analytics are handled via Google Analytics with appropriate user consent. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement, email obfuscation, and cookie consent. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident and could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces domain trust but the professional presentation and certifications mitigate concerns. Overall, the website is well-designed, content-rich, and professionally maintained, supporting the institution's credibility and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, maintaining up-to-date third-party libraries, and publishing explicit security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mou.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MOÚ operates as a non-profit healthcare institution focused on oncology, providing comprehensive cancer care and research. Its market position is strong within the Czech Republic, supported by OECI accreditation and participation in European and global clinical studies. The business model centers on patient care, preventive programs, and scientific research, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and academic collaborators. The website indicates a large-scale operation with over 10,000 hospitalizations annually and extensive outpatient services. Partnerships with various cancer and healthcare organizations enhance its ecosystem. The institution's digital presence is mature, with active social media engagement and detailed informational resources, reflecting a strategic approach to outreach and education.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. Email addresses are obfuscated to prevent scraping. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response information limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected, which could be added to enhance security culture and responsiveness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy and other security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data protection officer contact and privacy governance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Masarykův onkologický ústav
Description
Masarykův onkologický ústav (MOÚ) v Brně je specializované centrum praktikující nejmodernější léčebné postupy.
Key services
Oncological treatment, Diagnostics, Research and clinical studies, Preventive oncology programs, Education for professionals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Ion.RangeSlider, Sticky-js, Magnific Popup, Moment.js, Nette Framework (ajax, forms), Vanilla LazyLoad, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of obfuscator for email protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Strong focus on oncology healthcare services and research.
  5. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  6. Multiple social media and partner links indicate active engagement.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS likely based on the Nette Framework, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Moment.js. It employs lazy loading for images and uses FontAwesome for icons. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility and SEO. Performance is moderate, with some deferred loading of images and scripts. The use of cookie consent and GDPR compliance scripts indicates attention to privacy regulations. No hosting provider information was identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could be enhanced with additional security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mou.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mou.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.