Skip to main content

Security report for moonseven-editing.com

moonseven edito · Media · France

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

moonseven edito is a French content creation agency specializing in editorial strategy and content production for socially engaged organizations such as associations, foundations, NGOs, and socially responsible enterprises. Their services include content strategy consulting, motion design, web series, and video production, positioning them as a niche player in the media sector focused on social impact. The website is built on WordPress with a Bootstrap framework, integrating common marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager. While the site is professionally designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, and uses an outdated WordPress version, which may expose it to security risks. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and structure appear genuine and business-focused.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moonseven-editing.com

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specialized market segment focused on social impact and responsible media, serving NGOs, foundations, and socially responsible enterprises. Their business model revolves around providing editorial and content creation services that help clients build audience engagement and media responsibility. The presence of a partner domain (moonseven.fr) suggests a broader agency network. The website content is professionally crafted, indicating a mature content strategy, but the lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers may limit direct client engagement. The company appears small in size, with a focused niche and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an outdated WordPress version (4.8.27) is a significant security concern, as it may contain known vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating a low maturity in security governance. The site uses standard tracking tools without clear privacy compliance, which may pose regulatory risks under GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Update WordPress core and all plugins/themes to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Establish and communicate incident response procedures and security contact channels.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
moonseven edito
Description
Créateurs de contenu mettant la valeur contenu au cœur, accompagnant associations, fondations, ONG, départements RSE, entreprises sociales et engagées à développer une stratégie éditoriale, gagner de l’audience et devenir médias responsables.
Key services
Content strategy consulting, Editorial strategy, Motion design, Web series production, Video content, Cinemagraph creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.8.27, Bootstrap, jQuery 1.12.4, Font Awesome, Yoast SEO plugin 5.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure search form with GET method and no password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French language
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form present
  4. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link
  5. Uses outdated WordPress version (4.8.27) which may pose security risks
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  8. No visible security or incident response information
  9. WHOIS data missing, unusual for active domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.8.27 with Bootstrap and jQuery 1.12.4, indicating a somewhat outdated technology stack. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good navigation clarity and professional content presentation. However, the outdated CMS version and lack of modern security headers suggest technical debt and potential security risks. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good due to proper meta tags and structured data usage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moonseven-editing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moonseven-editing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.