Skip to main content

Security report for moonlightexchanger.com

Finance · Russia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MoonlightExchanger.com is a newly launched online electronic currency exchange platform primarily targeting Russian-speaking users. The website offers a wide range of currency exchange services including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, fiat currencies, and e-money systems. It supports multiple payment systems and provides a partner program to expand its reach. The platform is positioned as a niche player in the electronic currency exchange market with a focus on convenience and variety of exchange options. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive UI elements. It is hosted with a reputable registrar and uses HTTPS, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers which are recommended for enhanced security. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, it lacks a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. Contact information is limited to an email address and a Telegram bot, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moonlightexchanger.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the finance sector, specifically in electronic currency exchange. It targets users who need to exchange cryptocurrencies and electronic money, primarily in Russia. The business model is based on providing exchange services online with multiple currency and payment options. The presence of partner logos from known exchange aggregators suggests some level of market integration and trust. The company is small and newly founded in 2024, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. Revenue streams likely come from exchange fees and partner program commissions. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its wide currency support and 24/7 availability. Strategic observations include the need to enhance compliance documentation and security policies to build greater trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which prevents unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The site uses secure forms with CAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. No vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts used. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap that could expose the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response policies including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance contact information by adding phone support or physical address to improve business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Обменный пункт электронных валют
Key services
Electronic currency exchange, Cryptocurrency exchange, Fiat and e-money exchange, Partner program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Swiper.js, WordPress, PHP
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
JivoSite live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a newly launched electronic currency exchange platform targeting Russian-speaking users.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Multiple payment systems and cryptocurrencies supported.
  4. Contact information is limited to email and Telegram bot; no phone or physical address found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Website uses WordPress with several jQuery plugins and Swiper.js for UI.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Partner logos from known exchange aggregators add some trust signals.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond live chat.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It uses CDN services for fonts and scripts, improving load times. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Hosting and domain registration are recent but consistent with the business launch timeline. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags included but no structured JSON-LD data found. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could be exploited. The site uses CAPTCHA on forms to reduce spam and automated attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moonlightexchanger.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moonlightexchanger.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.