Skip to main content

Security report for moo-con.com

M.O.O.CON GmbH · Real Estate · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

M.O.O.CON GmbH is a leading consulting firm specializing in sustainable buildings, service, and change processes. The company focuses on creating identity-forming work, learning, and cultural environments that contribute significantly to business success, user satisfaction, and environmental sustainability. Their market position is strong within the German-speaking region, targeting corporate clients across various sectors including facility management, human resources, and organizational development. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their services and projects, supported by active social media engagement and content marketing through blogs and whitepapers. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern web fonts and widgets, but suffers from critical security shortcomings due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support. This exposes visitors to potential risks and undermines trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business credibility and content quality are high, but urgent security improvements are necessary to align with best practices and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moo-con.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
18
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate consulting sector with a focus on sustainability and transformation of work environments. Their business model revolves around strategic consulting and project management services tailored to corporate clients. The firm demonstrates a mature market presence with 15 years of domain registration and a medium-sized organizational scale. They maintain a strong partnership ecosystem visible through social media and content marketing channels. Growth indicators include active event participation and publication of thought leadership materials. The company targets decision-makers in corporate leadership, HR, and facility management, emphasizing next-generation workplace and infrastructure solutions. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The website content and WHOIS data align well, supporting legitimacy and trust.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and important security headers like HSTS are missing. OCSP stapling and session resumption are not configured, reducing the effectiveness of certificate validation and session security. While some security headers like X-Content-Type-Options are present, the overall configuration falls short of industry best practices. There is no evidence of incident response policies or security certifications on the site. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools is balanced with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms, but the insecure transport layer undermines data protection efforts. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to improve security and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols and disable deprecated SSL/TLS versions.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Configure OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Review and enhance security headers to include Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy.
  6. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to identify and mitigate risks.
  7. Maintain transparent and accessible privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  8. Establish an incident response contact channel and publish security policies if applicable.
  9. Optimize website performance to improve load times and user experience.
  10. Continue leveraging content marketing and social media to strengthen brand trust and engagement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server with TYPO3 CMS as the content management system. It uses Adobe Typekit for fonts and Elfsight widgets for Instagram integration. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS protocols, resulting in insecure HTTP connections. Performance metrics indicate zero load time and resource counts, suggesting incomplete or unmeasured performance data. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features at a basic level. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. The DNS setup is standard with no DNSSEC or CAA records, and the domain is registered with joker.com. The technical stack is modern but security configuration requires urgent improvement to meet current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moo-con.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moo-con.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.