Skip to main content

Security report for moo.com

MOO · Retail · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MOO is a well-established online printing service company founded in 2006, specializing in high-quality business cards, stickers, postcards, and other custom printed materials. The company targets businesses and professionals seeking premium printing solutions and operates a comprehensive e-commerce platform with a strong brand presence. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and offers a rich catalog of products and services, including promotional products and corporate gifting. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and TrustArc for privacy compliance, and is built on Magnolia CMS. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and bot protection mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, which is typical for commercial entities. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and secure, with minor recommendations for enhanced security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moo.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention moo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18,768
Employees
2
Customers
18,633
Third parties
133
Weak passwords
15%

Latest record dated 2026-04-20 · 23 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for moo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –secure.moo.com2026-04-20
  • –secure.moo.com2025-12-24

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MOO holds a strong market position as a premium online print shop with a diverse product range catering to business clients. Its business model revolves around e-commerce sales of printed materials and branded merchandise. The company benefits from a large volume of customer reviews indicating high customer satisfaction. The target audience includes small to medium businesses and professionals requiring custom print solutions. The company maintains active social media channels and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement. The lack of visible parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation. Growth opportunities may include expanding corporate gifting and promotional product lines. The company’s use of privacy and consent tools aligns with regulatory requirements, enhancing customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, and implementation of a cookie consent mechanism via TrustArc. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could enhance security communication. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and published security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  5. Enhance data retention and privacy policy disclosures to align with evolving regulatory requirements and customer expectations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MOO
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MOO
Description
Online printing services to create high-quality business cards, stickers, postcards, and more. Professional custom printing by MOO, the best online print shop.
Key services
Business Cards, Postcards, Stickers & Labels, Marketing Materials, Stationery, Promotional Products, Custom Cards, Corporate Gifting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, TrustArc Cookie Consent, Lazy loading images
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
TrustArc Cookie Consent, LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong branding and consistent design
  3. Comprehensive product catalog for printing and promotional products
  4. Use of modern web technologies and privacy compliance tools
  5. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection or domain aliasing
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  7. Contact info is clearly provided in structured data
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magnolia CMS and uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and TrustArc for privacy consent management. It employs lazy loading for images and custom web fonts to optimize performance and user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, including organization details and aggregate ratings. Performance appears fast with preconnect and dns-prefetch hints for critical external resources. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and publish more detailed technical and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.