Skip to main content

Security report for molgroup.info

MOL Group · Energy · Hungary

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MOL Group is a well-established international integrated oil and gas company headquartered in Hungary, with a diversified portfolio spanning exploration and production, downstream refining, petrochemicals, and innovative business services. The company targets investors, business partners, and consumers with a comprehensive digital presence that emphasizes transparency, sustainability, and corporate governance. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a strong market position in the energy sector, offering a wide range of products and services including fuels, lubricants, and mobility solutions. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. It features good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, supported by a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and DNSSEC implementation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with CSRF protection and cookie consent controls, but lacks explicit published security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. The WHOIS data aligns with the company's Hungarian origin and business maturity, though some registrant details are redacted for privacy. Overall, MOL Group's website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a reliable digital asset for the company. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and DNS security would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching molgroup.info

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
72
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention molgroup.info, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
434
Employees
3
Customers
319
Third parties
112
Weak passwords
22%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for molgroup.info.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.molgroup.info2025-07-20
  • –mail.molgroup.info2025-07-20
  • –mail.molgroup.info2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MOL Group holds a leading position in the Central European energy market, leveraging a vertically integrated business model that covers upstream exploration and production, downstream refining and petrochemicals, and innovative consumer and business services. Its diversified revenue streams include wholesale fuels, retail services, petrochemical products, and loyalty programs. The company targets a broad customer base including industrial clients, consumers, and investors. The presence of detailed investor relations content and sustainability reporting indicates a focus on transparency and long-term stakeholder engagement. Partnerships and subsidiaries such as Slovnaft and MOL Group Chemicals expand its operational footprint. The company’s strategic focus on innovation and sustainability positions it well for future growth in a transitioning energy landscape.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, CSRF tokens implemented, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects GDPR requirements. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers with clientTransferProhibited status, though DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services is balanced with user consent controls. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MOL Group
Description
MOL Group is a leading international, integrated oil and gas company from Hungary, the heart of Europe, with over 75 years of experience and a proven track record.
Key services
Exploration & Production, Downstream refining and petrochemicals, Natural gas transmission, Wholesale fuels and aviation fuels, Loyalty cards and consumer services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery (implied by usage of $lang and scripts), Cookie consent management scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • CSRF token meta tag present
  • Cookie consent with categories and user control
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Meta (Facebook) Pixel
Marketing tools
Meta Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured with comprehensive business and investor information.
  2. Strong focus on transparency with investor relations, sustainability, and governance content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and user control.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact is via forms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  6. Use of multiple external analytics and tracking services with GDPR compliance measures.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content or domains.
  8. WHOIS data partially redacted but consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, with scripts loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable and scalable backend services. The site is mobile optimized with accessibility features such as skip-to-content links and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Cookie consent is managed via custom scripts allowing granular user control. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and resource optimization. No CMS or framework is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with molgroup.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review molgroup.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.