Skip to main content

Security report for mol.hu

MOL · Energy · Hungary

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MOL Magyarország is a leading energy and transportation company with a strong market presence in Hungary and surrounding countries. The company offers a wide range of services including fuel retail, lubricants, electric vehicle charging, corporate fuel supply, and innovative mobility solutions such as car sharing. The website reflects a mature enterprise with comprehensive service offerings targeting both individual consumers and corporate clients. The digital infrastructure is built on modern technologies like Vue.js and integrates essential analytics and marketing tools, demonstrating a good level of digital maturity. Security measures such as HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and detailed cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, although some security headers could be enhanced. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and user consent options. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting MOL's position as a reputable energy sector leader.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mol.hu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mol.hu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,649
Employees
57
Customers
3,374
Third parties
218
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 71 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mol.hu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –molbudawxadm01.mol.hu2026-05-28
  • –level.ris.mol.hu2026-05-28
  • –molbudawxadm01.mol.hu2026-05-25
  • –sso.mol.hu2026-05-21
  • –sso.mol.hu2026-05-21

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MOL operates as an essential entity in the energy and transportation sectors, serving a broad audience from retail customers to large corporate clients. Its business model includes direct fuel sales, loyalty programs, and digital services that enhance customer engagement. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with dedicated portals and specialized services, indicating a strategic approach to market expansion and customer retention. MOL's long domain history and consistent branding reinforce its market credibility. The company leverages digital channels effectively for marketing and customer interaction, positioning itself competitively in the regional energy market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse, and a comprehensive cookie consent framework aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options are not evident in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. No direct incident response or abuse contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, MOL shows a mature security approach but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formalized incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish an incident response or abuse contact page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure processes.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MOL
Description
Minden, ami a közlekedéshez kell: üzemanyag, biztosítás, bringaprogram, akciók és még sok minden más….
Key services
Fuel retail, Lubricants and car care, Corporate fuel supply, Electric vehicle charging, Car sharing (MOL Limo), Online fuel ordering and card services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, Owl Carousel, Axios, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Strong presence of corporate and consumer services related to energy and transportation.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via forms.
  7. Social media presence is strong and consistent with corporate branding.
  8. No explicit security.txt or incident response contact found.
  9. Cookie consent categories are detailed and user-configurable.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and integrates several third-party services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API. The presence of prefetch and preload tags indicates optimization efforts for performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses Owl Carousel for interactive content display. Cookie consent is managed via a dedicated JavaScript library, ensuring compliance and user control. While performance is moderate, there is room for improvement in hosting transparency and potential CMS identification. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mol.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mol.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.