Is mokilizingas.lt Safe? Security Analysis for Inbank
http://mokilizingas.ltCheck if mokilizingas.lt is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
Below Finance avg (78)
GDPR-aligned
Data handling
EU
Hosting region
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Unlock the full report for mokilizingas.lt
Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.
Optional add-ons
via BREACHYour order
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
via EveryPayAI Summary
Inbank is a Lithuanian financial institution specializing in digital banking and lending services. Founded in 2015, it targets retail customers primarily in Lithuania, offering loans and deposit products through a modern digital platform. The website reflects a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing technologies such as jQuery, Nuxt.js, and integration with Dokobit for digital signatures, indicating a focus on secure and streamlined customer interactions. The hosting infrastructure appears to be on Amazon AWS, supporting scalability and reliability. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and digital signature integration; however, the absence of explicit security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response information suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website is professionally designed with good user experience but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures, which are critical for trust in the financial sector.
Detected Technologies
13 urgent findings need attention
1 critical · 12 high
- + 5 more findings in the full report below
Keep mokilizingas.lt under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
Security Headers
4 findings
55/100
GDPR Compliance
4 findings
25/100
NIS2 Compliance
9 findings
2/100
Email Security
4 findings
75/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Inbank operates in the competitive Lithuanian banking sector with a digital-first approach, focusing on retail lending and deposit services. Its business model leverages online platforms to reduce operational costs and enhance customer convenience. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The absence of visible marketing or advertising tools suggests reliance on organic growth or direct customer acquisition. The company does not publicly disclose detailed contact or compliance information on the analyzed page, which may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the provided data, indicating a focused operational scope. Growth indicators and market positioning appear stable but could benefit from enhanced transparency and communication of trust signals.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS and integrates digital signature technology via Dokobit, which is a positive security indicator for transaction authenticity. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting avenues for responsible reporting of security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms raises compliance concerns with GDPR and related regulations. No explicit incident response contacts or abuse channels are provided, which is a gap in security readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident management to meet best practices for a financial institution.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
✨Observations
Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Inbank
Inbank is a financial institution offering banking services including loans and deposits primarily targeting retail customers.
basic
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
- Use of digital signature integration (Dokobit)
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the mokilizingas.lt security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing Permissions-Policy header
Controls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete mokilizingas.lt security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'google' uses 464-bit key
No BIMI Record
BIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
DNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
Domain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
Domain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
How does mokilizingas.lt compare?
See how mokilizingas.lt stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the mokilizingas.lt report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
Optional add-ons
via BREACHYour order
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
via EveryPayScan your own website
Liked the mokilizingas.lt report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about mokilizingas.lt
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published