Skip to main content

Security report for mohogarden.lv

Kaamos · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moho Garden is a modern residential real estate project located in Mežaparks, Latvia, developed by the family-owned Estonian company Kaamos. The project emphasizes sustainable urban living with energy-efficient buildings, solar panels, and high-quality interior finishes. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels including phone, email, and a contact form. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with good technical implementation and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mohogarden.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kaamos, the developer behind Moho Garden, is a medium-sized family-owned company with 20 years of experience in real estate and construction, operating in Latvia and Estonia. Their business model focuses on developing energy-efficient residential properties with a Scandinavian design influence. The company targets homebuyers seeking modern, green urban living. The website supports their market positioning with detailed project descriptions, demo apartment showcases, and clear sales contacts. The partnership ecosystem includes their official Latvian and Estonian websites. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly, supporting lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms from spam. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could improve transparency and preparedness. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page limits external security communication. Overall, the site is secure for typical business use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kaamos
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kaamos
Description
Moho Garden is a modern residential project located in Mežaparks, Latvia, developed by the family-owned Estonian company Kaamos. The project emphasizes green urban living with modern architecture, energy-efficient solutions, and high-quality finishes. It offers apartments with balconies and terraces, solar panels for common areas, and a landscaped, gated environment.
Key services
Residential apartment development, Interior design and finishing, Energy-efficient building solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Owl Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Hustle Popup Plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based real estate project site with modern design and good user experience.
  2. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels including phone, email, and contact form.
  3. Privacy policy is linked and appears comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  5. Security best practices partially implemented; HTTPS and reCAPTCHA present but security headers missing.
  6. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Marketing and tracking tools used responsibly with cookie consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using Bootstrap 4.4.1 and jQuery 3.7.1, with additional libraries such as Owl Carousel for image sliders. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No hosting provider information was detected. The site uses multiple external resources from trusted domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mohogarden.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mohogarden.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.