Skip to main content

Security report for mofos.com

Aylo Premium Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mofos.com is a professionally operated adult entertainment website specializing in amateur POV pornographic videos. It is owned and operated by Aylo Premium Ltd., a recognized entity in the adult media industry. The platform offers a large catalog of high-quality videos featuring popular models and provides subscription-based access alongside pay-per-view options. The website is designed with modern web technologies, including React and Flickity, and integrates security features such as HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect users and prevent abuse. Legal compliance is evident with clear terms of service, privacy policies, and age verification disclaimers prominently displayed. Despite the absence of WHOIS registration data, the site’s professional presentation and association with known payment processors and support domains indicate a legitimate and trustworthy operation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mofos.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mofos.com holds a strong market position within the adult entertainment sector, targeting adult consumers seeking amateur POV content. The business model revolves around subscription and transactional video streaming, supported by affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships such as TrafficJunky and AdultForce. The company leverages a proprietary content management platform and integrates trusted payment processors like Probiller and Vend-o. The site’s extensive video catalog, model profiles, and curated categories enhance user engagement and retention. Strategic partnerships and a robust support infrastructure further strengthen its competitive advantage. The brand maintains consistent and professional branding, reinforcing trust and market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of advanced bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Security headers are partially implemented, with room for improvement in Content-Security-Policy and clickjacking protections. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response contact is available via a dedicated support email. Overall, the site balances user experience with security controls effectively, though enhancements in header policies and regular security audits are recommended to maintain resilience against evolving threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and data injection risks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  3. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce secure connections.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aylo Premium Ltd.
Description
Mofos offers amateur POV adult video content featuring thousands of videos with popular pornstars in high-quality formats including 4K.
Key services
Streaming adult videos, Subscription memberships, Content discovery by categories and models
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by JSX/react data-rh attributes), Flickity carousel, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Google Fonts (Roboto, Droid Sans), Probiller payment integration, Project1Content platform services
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Tracking pixels
Probiller tracking
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed adult content platform with extensive video content and model profiles.
  2. Strong legal compliance with clear terms, privacy, and age verification disclaimers.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  4. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual but likely due to privacy protection or registrar policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (React) with dynamic content loading and interactive UI components such as Flickity carousels. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection. The platform is supported by Project1Content’s infrastructure, which provides APIs for authentication, content delivery, and navigation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information but uses CDN and asset delivery networks for media content. Technical debt appears low, though improvements in security header implementation and accessibility compliance are advisable to future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mofos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mofos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.