Moet ik naar de dokter? is a Dutch healthcare advice platform that provides patients with direct, reliable guidance on whether they need to contact a general practitioner based on their symptoms. The website offers a self-triage widget, health complaint search, and advice on self-care, positioning itself as a trusted online resource in the Netherlands. The platform targets patients seeking quick and trustworthy medical advice without immediate doctor consultation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern plugins such as Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO, and integrates third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Pagesense for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure, ensuring good performance and scalability. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit published security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good SEO, accessibility, and user experience, but could improve by publishing formal security and vulnerability disclosure policies.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Critical
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention moetiknaardedokter.nl, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for moetiknaardedokter.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The platform operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on digital patient triage and advice services. Its business model likely revolves around providing free or subscription-based access to symptom checking and directing patients to appropriate care. The company maintains a consistent brand and has social media channels to engage users. The absence of direct phone or email contacts suggests a digital-first approach emphasizing online interaction. The multi-language support indicates an ambition to serve a broader European audience. The involvement of a Medical Board and structured content enhances credibility. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating a standalone operation. The platform's partnerships or integrations with healthcare providers or emergency services are not explicitly detailed but may exist given the nature of the service.
Security posture
The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present. The use of Google Tag Manager and Pagesense indicates controlled script management and user tracking, balanced with cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure channels represents a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should consider implementing a security.txt file and publishing incident response information to enhance trust and compliance. Regular audits of third-party scripts and enhanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy would further strengthen security.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
Add incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and response.
Enhance security headers with Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy.
Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Moet ik naar de dokter?
Description
Meteen weten of u naar de dokter moet? Bij ons krijgt u direct betrouwbaar advies.
Key services
health complaints advice, self-triage widget, contact guidance for general practitioners, health complaint search
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Pagesense, Mindd Widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
Consent mechanism for cookies
Analytics and tracking
Services
Pagesense, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Pagesense
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a Dutch healthcare advice platform providing direct triage and self-care guidance.
Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO tools.
Includes multi-language support with language switcher.
Has embedded self-triage widget powered by Mindd.
No direct email or phone contact found on homepage; contact via form only.
Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram.
Cookie consent mechanism implemented via external banner.
No explicit security or incident response policies published.
No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for form handling, Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Pagesense. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, inferred from preview domain references. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The use of external scripts is controlled, but continuous monitoring is recommended to avoid introducing vulnerabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online healthcare advice platform.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with moetiknaardedokter.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moetiknaardedokter.nl.