Skip to main content

Security report for moe-service.com

Moeller Operating Engineering GmbH · Energy · Germany

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moeller Operating Engineering GmbH operates as an accredited competence center specializing in certification, measurement, and inspection services related to the grid integration of decentralized energy systems. The company targets professionals and businesses in the energy sector, particularly those involved with decentralized energy installations. The website presents a professional image with consistent branding and clear business focus, supported by structured data and SEO optimization. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent management. Hosting and domain registration are stable and consistent with the company's history since 2008. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, there is room for improvement in DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moe-service.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
58
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche position in the energy sector, focusing on certification and inspection services for decentralized energy systems. Its business model revolves around providing accredited technical services to energy producers and grid operators. The website's content and metadata emphasize accreditation and competence, which are key trust signals in this industry. The absence of explicit contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly to ensure qualified inquiries. The use of reputable plugins and SEO tools indicates an investment in digital presence and marketing. The domain age and registration details reinforce the company's established presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is managed via Borlabs Cookie, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure, which are important for transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security policy and vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to demonstrate transparency and readiness.
  5. Include clear contact information, including emails and phone numbers, to facilitate communication and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Moeller Operating Engineering GmbH
Description
M.O.E. ist Ihre akkreditierte Kompetenzstelle im Bereich Zertifizierung, Messung und Inspektion hinsichtlich der Netzintegration Ihrer dezentralen Energieanlage.
Key services
Zertifizierung, Messung, Inspektion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO, Borlabs Cookie
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Borlabs Cookie
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  5. Use of modern WordPress theme and SEO plugin
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No explicit security headers detected
  8. SSL is enabled and valid
  9. WHOIS data consistent and domain age supports legitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Avada theme, which is widely used and regularly updated. The presence of Yoast SEO indicates good SEO practices, and Borlabs Cookie manages cookie consent effectively. The site loads moderate performance scripts such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager. Hosting appears stable with domain registration dating back to 2008. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization possible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moe-service.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moe-service.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.