Skip to main content

Security report for moc.ee

Marketex Offshore Constructions · Energy · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Marketex Offshore Constructions is a specialized manufacturer of complex steel structures serving the Offshore Oil & Gas, Renewables, Infrastructure, and Industrial sectors. Founded in 2014 and operating under the parent company BLRT Grupp, the company emphasizes quality and compliance with industry standards such as NORSOK, DNV GL, ABS, and BV. Their modern facilities support large fabrication projects primarily targeting the North Sea region and beyond. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear business information and a focus on safety and quality through their QHSE policies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, complemented by a cookie consent mechanism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching moc.ee

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention moc.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for moc.ee right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Marketex Offshore Constructions positions itself as a key player in the offshore steel fabrication market, leveraging its parent company BLRT Grupp's support. The business model focuses on delivering high-quality, standards-compliant steel structures for demanding offshore and industrial projects. Their target audience includes oil and gas companies, renewable energy developers, and infrastructure project stakeholders. The company demonstrates growth and modernization through new facilities opened in 2020. Partnerships, such as with avar.ee, indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and corporate responsibility, enhancing market credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, indicating a secure baseline. Security best practices include cookie consent and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, and there is no published vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy. The QHSE section highlights internal safety and quality management but does not extend to cybersecurity policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in formalizing security policies and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and security posture.
  4. Provide incident response contact information to facilitate security incident reporting and management.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve website security and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BLRT Grupp
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Marketex Offshore Constructions
Description
Marketex Offshore Constructions specializes in complex steel structures for Offshore Oil & Gas, Renewables, Infrastructure and Industrial projects. They manufacture according to NORSOK, DNV GL, ABS and BV requirements and have modern welding, machining and painting facilities.
Key services
Complex steel structure fabrication, Welding, Machining, Painting, Project delivery for North Sea and beyond
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery, Swiper.js, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Security policies related to QHSE are described but no formal security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF challenge pages.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with cookie consent.
  9. Parent company BLRT Grupp is mentioned, adding trust.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing jQuery, Swiper.js for carousels, and Fancybox for media display. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking user behavior, with cookie consent implemented. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, contributing to moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site structure is clear with multilingual support (English, Estonian, Russian). Some technical improvements could include enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations, as well as the addition of security headers to strengthen defenses against common web attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with moc.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review moc.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.