Skip to main content

Security report for mobil.eg

Mobil · Energy · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mobil is a globally recognized brand specializing in fuels, lubricants, and advanced technology services primarily serving business and consumer markets. As a subsidiary of ExxonMobil, it holds a strong market position in the energy sector, offering products that enhance equipment performance and efficiency. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, professional design, and clear navigation tailored for a broad audience including industrial clients and end consumers. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks, cloud hosting, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, content security policies, and cookie consent mechanisms, although some security-related pages like incident response or vulnerability disclosure are not publicly visible. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is redacted, which is common for large corporate domains but reduces transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mobil.eg

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
52
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mobil operates within the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on lubricants and fuels. Its business model combines B2B and B2C approaches, targeting industrial clients and consumers. The brand benefits from ExxonMobil's global infrastructure and reputation, enabling extensive market reach and product innovation. The website's integration with corporate and subsidiary domains reflects a cohesive partnership ecosystem. Marketing efforts utilize advanced tracking and retargeting technologies, supporting data-driven customer engagement. Growth indicators include a strong digital footprint and comprehensive content offerings. However, direct contact information is limited on the homepage, which may affect customer support accessibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, Content Security Policy, and cookie consent compliance. Use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is extensive but managed with privacy controls. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of publicly accessible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. WHOIS data redaction is noted but likely due to privacy policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be enhanced by publishing dedicated security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and customer trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance visibility of contact information for security and privacy concerns to facilitate communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Continue to monitor and improve privacy compliance in line with evolving regulations such as GDPR and NIS2.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mobil
Description
Known for performance and innovation, and recognized for our advanced technology in fuels, lubricants and services.
Key services
fuels, lubricants, technology services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AWS (Amazon Web Services), Google Tag Manager, OneTrust, Coveo Search, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
AWS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, AppDynamics, Foresee, Pardot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Google Ads, Taboola, Outbrain
Tracking pixels
AppDynamics, PriceSpider, BazaarVoice, Foresee, Pardot, Lead Forensics, Spotify Pixels
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Visual Website Optimizer, Kampyle, Medallia
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Strong corporate branding consistent with ExxonMobil ownership
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage content
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  7. No explicit security or incident response policy pages detected
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or redacted, reducing transparency but not indicating fraud
  9. Website is mobile optimized and accessible
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

Mobil.com is built on a modern technology stack including Sitecore CMS, Bootstrap framework, and hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. The site uses advanced JavaScript libraries for UI components and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data. The site employs a comprehensive Content Security Policy and other security headers, indicating attention to security best practices. Technical risks are minimal but include the complexity of third-party integrations which require ongoing management to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mobil.eg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mobil.eg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.