Skip to main content

Security report for mmpevent.de

MMP Event GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MMP Event GmbH is a medium-sized event agency operating as a 100% subsidiary of the Seven.One Entertainment Group in Germany. The company specializes in developing innovative event formats, managing event execution, marketing, and 360-degree communication, including TV event marketing and consulting in sports, media, and culture sectors. Their strong integration with the parent media group positions them uniquely to combine media and event marketing for maximum visibility and audience engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, with standard SEO and marketing tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and UserCentrics CMP for cookie consent. However, the site suffers from an invalid SSL certificate and lacks advanced security configurations, which poses risks to user trust and data security. The company maintains GDPR compliance with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible incident response or security policy documentation. Overall, the business is professionally presented with good content quality and consistent branding, but technical and security improvements are necessary to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mmpevent.de

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MMP Event GmbH leverages its exclusive relationship with Seven.One Entertainment Group to offer integrated event and media marketing services. Their business model focuses on creating unique event experiences combined with media exposure, targeting media partners, sponsors, and corporate clients. The company’s market position is strong within the German media and event industry, supported by a medium-sized team and a portfolio of 100 event days, 40 venues, and a reach of 2 billion with 900,000 visitors. Their partnership ecosystem includes the parent company and job portals for talent acquisition. Growth indicators include active marketing and consulting services in sports, media, and culture. The company’s digital presence is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and incident response transparency to strengthen stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The current security posture of MMP Event GmbH’s website is basic and requires significant improvements. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a critical vulnerability that undermines secure communications and user trust. The lack of HSTS, DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records further exposes the domain to potential attacks such as man-in-the-middle, email spoofing, and unauthorized certificate issuance. While SPF is correctly configured, the missing DMARC policy is a compliance gap. No incident response or security policy pages are publicly available, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. The use of UserCentrics CMP demonstrates GDPR compliance in cookie management, but overall security best practices are not fully implemented. Addressing these gaps is essential to mitigate risks and align with industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic and protect user data.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Configure a DMARC policy to protect the domain from email spoofing and phishing attacks.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to ensure DNS query integrity and prevent cache poisoning.
  5. Add CAA records to restrict which certificate authorities can issue certificates for the domain.
  6. Publish a security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and readiness.
  7. Review and implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MMP Event GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder framework, which provides a flexible and feature-rich environment. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin, and marketing is supported by Google Tag Manager and UserCentrics CMP for cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 4.9 seconds and 109 resources loaded, indicating potential optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting details are limited but DNS records indicate use of p7s1ns nameservers and Outlook mail protection. The invalid SSL certificate is a major technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization and security hardening to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mmpevent.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmpevent.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.