Skip to main content

Security report for mmldevelopment.lv

MML Development · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MML Development operates a website promoting energy-efficient residential homes in Mārupe, Latvia. The company targets home buyers interested in sustainable and smart home living, offering detailed house plans and modern amenities. The website is professionally designed using modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with integrated Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no visible advanced security headers or policies, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a credible real estate business with room for improvement in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mmldevelopment.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local real estate developer specializing in energy-efficient and smart homes, catering primarily to families in Latvia. The business model focuses on property development and sales, with a clear emphasis on sustainability and modern living. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing customer trust. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting the company's market positioning. Absence of privacy and security policies suggests a need for enhanced compliance measures. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or content analysis.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics scripts but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, which could hinder timely security incident management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information.
  4. Conduct a WHOIS domain registration update or verification to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and search ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MML Development
Description
MML Development offers energy-efficient residential houses in Mārupe, Latvia, featuring modern smart home technologies, high-quality finishing materials, and family-friendly environment.
Key services
Energy-efficient house construction, Smart home management, Real estate sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Splide.js carousel, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (not explicitly confirmed)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a real estate project site for energy-efficient homes in Latvia.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact info includes company email and phone number with clear context.
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 5, jQuery, and Splide.js for interactive carousels. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or backend technologies were identified from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. The absence of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory adherence. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires improvements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mmldevelopment.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mmldevelopment.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.