Skip to main content

Security report for mlyn-hoslovice.cz

Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vodní Mlýn Hoslovice is a cultural heritage museum website representing a historic water mill in the Czech Republic. The site targets tourists and local visitors interested in history and cultural experiences. The business operates as a small-scale museum attraction with a focus on educational and cultural services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, with modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with no visible privacy policy or terms of service, which should be addressed to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its niche, but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mlyn-hoslovice.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a niche cultural and historical market segment, focusing on museum visitors and tourists in the Czech Republic. It leverages a straightforward business model centered on visitor engagement and cultural education. The lack of detailed business registration or certifications suggests a small or local operation. The site does not display partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating independent operation. Marketing and analytics are modest, relying on Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for tracking and consent. Growth potential lies in expanding digital presence and improving compliance and security to build visitor trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a security.txt file or incident response contacts highlight gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security controls and publishing clear security and privacy policies to enhance its security culture and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website represents Vodní Mlýn Hoslovice, a historic water mill museum located in the Czech Republic, associated with Muzeum Strakonice. It provides information about the museum, its exhibits, and visitor information.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Visitor tours, Cultural events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Elementor, Astra Theme, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech language focused on a local museum.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or linked pages.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and Elementor page builder.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No explicit business registration or certification information found.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  10. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a flexible and widely supported technical infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting and DNS setup is consistent with a Czech registrar and hosting provider. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries in the provided content, but security headers are missing, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but has room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mlyn-hoslovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mlyn-hoslovice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.