Skip to main content

Security report for mlinar.hr

Mlinar · Retail · Croatia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mlinar is a well-established Croatian bakery and retail food company with a domain registered since 1999, indicating a mature market presence. The website presents a professional design with consistent branding and clear focus on bakery products and retail services. The technical infrastructure includes modern CSS frameworks and JavaScript libraries, with integration of popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Meta Pixel. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, demonstrating attention to privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving a general audience with safe content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mlinar.hr

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mlinar operates in the retail bakery sector in Croatia, targeting general consumers interested in bakery and food products. The business model is retail-focused with physical store presence and online marketing. The company benefits from a strong brand identity and uses third-party services for analytics and advertising. No direct contact information or detailed corporate disclosures were found, which could be improved for transparency. The domain age and registrar data support the legitimacy and stability of the business. The company appears to have a solid market position in Croatia with potential for growth through digital channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses CSRF tokens to protect forms, indicating good baseline security practices. Cookie consent is implemented with a comprehensive mechanism via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a detailed privacy policy page accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mlinar
Description
Srce puno okusa. Obitelj, zajedništvo, tradicija, kvaliteta, prijateljstvo… sastojci su utkani u naš recept poslovanja od prvoga dana
Key services
Bakery products, Retail sales, Food services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Splide.js, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Meta Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management with detailed cookie categories
  2. No explicit privacy policy page found in provided content
  3. No terms of service page detected
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided
  5. Use of modern CSS framework (Tailwind) and JS libraries (Splide)
  6. Tracking scripts for Google Analytics and Meta Pixel present
  7. CSRF token meta tag present indicating some security measures
  8. WHOIS data shows long domain age and Croatian registrar consistent with business location
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including Tailwind CSS and Splide.js for UI components. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with a detailed categorization of cookies and providers. Analytics and marketing scripts from Google and Meta are integrated, enabling extensive user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Hosting appears to be local or regional with CARNET as registrar. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or backend technology was explicitly detected from the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mlinar.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mlinar.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.