Skip to main content

Security report for mizuhosi.com

Mizuho OSI · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mizuho OSI is a specialized healthcare company focused on manufacturing and supplying surgical tables and pressure management products primarily for orthopedic and spine surgeons. With over 40 years of industry presence, the company offers a range of surgical tables, positioning accessories, and related products designed to improve patient outcomes. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with WooCommerce, incorporating modern web technologies and compliance mechanisms such as GDPR cookie consent. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, targeting healthcare professionals and institutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mizuhosi.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mizuhosi.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mizuhosi.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mizuho OSI operates in the healthcare sector, serving a niche market of orthopedic and spine surgical equipment. Their business model centers on product manufacturing and direct sales, supported by a comprehensive online catalog and support infrastructure. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. The presence of detailed product categories and support links indicates a customer-focused approach. However, the lack of visible corporate registration or WHOIS transparency may impact trust among some stakeholders. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and a solid market position in surgical product solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The use of numerous third-party scripts and ad networks introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to enhance policy visibility and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to engage with security researchers.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mizuho OSI
Description
Orthopedic and spine surgeons have used Mizuho OSI specialized surgical tables and pressure management products over 40 years for improved patient outcomes.
Key services
Surgical tables, Pressure management products, Positioning accessories, Surgical table attachments and tops, Orthopedic and trauma tables
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Bootstrap 4, jQuery, FontAwesome, OwlCarousel, Fancybox, Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, Elementor, WPBakery Page Builder, Popup Maker, ShiftNav, UberMenu
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Pardot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Casale Media, Smart Ad Server, Yieldmo, DeepIntent, Bidswitch
Tracking pixels
ShareThis, Pardot
Marketing tools
Pardot, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional healthcare industry focus
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy compliance mechanisms
  4. No signs of adult or questionable content
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response page
  7. WHOIS data missing, raising legitimacy questions
  8. Good SEO and mobile optimization
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses a combination of popular front-end libraries and frameworks including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, FontAwesome, OwlCarousel, and Fancybox. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin, and page building is managed through Elementor and WPBakery Page Builder. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics, marketing, and social sharing, including Pardot and ShareThis. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and responsive design. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mizuhosi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mizuhosi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.