Skip to main content

Security report for mirai.com

Mirai · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mirai is a specialized company focused on enhancing hotel distribution and boosting direct sales channels for hospitality businesses. Their offerings include technology solutions, marketing services, and strategic consultancy aimed at reducing dependency on OTAs and increasing gross operating profit. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation with multilingual support for various markets including Spain, France, Portugal, Latin America, and the US. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, leveraging common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and GDPR Cookie Compliance to ensure privacy adherence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although the absence of security headers and explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, impacting trust and transparency despite the active and professional web presence. Overall, Mirai demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and good privacy compliance, positioning itself as a credible player in the hospitality technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mirai.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mirai.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
215
Employees
4
Customers
181
Third parties
30
Weak passwords
18%

Latest record dated 2026-06-01 · 12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mirai.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sso.mirai.com2026-06-01
  • –sso.mirai.com2026-05-31
  • –sso.mirai.com2026-02-26
  • –sso.mirai.com2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mirai operates in the hospitality sector, targeting hotels seeking to optimize their direct sales channels and reduce OTA reliance. Their business model is B2B, providing integrated technology, marketing, and consultancy services. The multilingual website indicates a broad geographic focus including Europe and the Americas. The company leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics platforms such as Google, Meta, and Microsoft for marketing and retargeting. The absence of explicit contact details and WHOIS transparency may limit some trust signals but the professional presentation and GDPR compliance suggest a well-established operation. The company likely generates revenue through service contracts and technology licensing. Growth potential is supported by the increasing demand for direct booking solutions in the hospitality industry.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, reflecting a strong commitment to privacy. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicates limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers, publishing incident response information, and implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website, including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide clear contact information including phone numbers and emails to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mirai
Description
At Mirai we work very close to our clients to boost their direct channel sales, reducing their OTA dependency and increasing the GOP (gross operating profit). We provide technology, marketing services and the best strategic consultancy.
Key services
Technology solutions for hotel distribution, Marketing services, Strategic consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, Contact Form 7, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Doubleclick, Meta, Facebook, Instagram, Microsoft, Twitter, Yandex
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to hospitality industry
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency
  6. Use of common and reputable third-party libraries and plugins
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  8. No terms of service page found
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It uses popular plugins such as Contact Form 7 for forms and GDPR Cookie Compliance for privacy management. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs including Google APIs and MaxCDN. The site demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and canonical links. No hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mirai.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mirai.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.