Skip to main content

Security report for mimiko.lv

MIMIKO · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MIMIKO is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in Korean cosmetics and skincare products. The website offers a range of facial and body care items including masks, patches, creams, and decorative cosmetics, with free delivery across Latvia for orders over 30 euros. The business targets general consumers interested in Korean beauty products and operates primarily online through a WooCommerce-powered WordPress platform. The company demonstrates a consistent brand presence with verified social media accounts and structured data including VAT identification, enhancing its credibility. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including WordPress, WooCommerce, Bootstrap, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized and shows good SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with caching and lazy loading implemented via WP Rocket. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses some security plugins, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policies clearly presented. Overall, MIMIKO presents a professional and trustworthy online retail presence with good technical and privacy practices. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust assessment, but the visible business information and digital footprint support legitimacy. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would further enhance the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mimiko.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MIMIKO operates in the niche market of Korean cosmetics retail in Latvia, leveraging e-commerce to reach its target audience. The business model is direct online sales with free shipping incentives to increase order value. The company benefits from a focused product offering and a clear brand identity. Its partnership ecosystem includes payment processing via Klix and marketing through major ad networks. The presence of enhanced ecommerce tracking indicates a data-driven approach to marketing and sales optimization. Growth potential exists in expanding product lines and regional reach. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers and build brand loyalty.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of security-related plugins such as stop-user-enumeration. However, the lack of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate compliance with GDPR, but no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments of WordPress and plugins.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Maintain up-to-date privacy and cookie policies with transparent data retention disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
MIMIKO
VAT number
LV42103093632
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MIMIKO
Description
Sejas un ķermeņa kopšanas produkti – maskas, patči, krēmi, dekoratīvā kosmētika. Bezmaksas piegāde visā Latvijā no 30€.
Key services
Online sales of Korean skincare and cosmetics, Free delivery in Latvia for orders over 30€
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Ajax Search Lite, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., stop-user-enumeration)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform selling Korean cosmetics in Latvia.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools for marketing and analytics.
  3. Has GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  5. No security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
  7. Contact information includes phone number and social media links.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected.
  9. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket caching and lazy loading. The site uses Google Fonts and CDN resources for assets. While the technical stack is modern and well-integrated, there is room for improvement in security header implementation and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and scalable e-commerce platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mimiko.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mimiko.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.