Skip to main content

Security report for miltton.lv

Miltton Latvia · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Miltton Latvia is a creative and dynamic agency focused on providing communication consulting and branding services to clients in Latvia and the Baltic region. The company positions itself as a bold and innovative partner helping clients to be visible in a changing world. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for SEO, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for GDPR compliance, and integrates Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of business professionalism, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, suitable for a medium-sized agency in the media sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching miltton.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Miltton Latvia operates in the media and communication sector, targeting businesses seeking creative agency services in the Baltic region. The company leverages a multilingual web presence to serve diverse markets. Its business model centers on consulting, crisis communication, media relations, and branding. The presence of sister sites in other Baltic countries indicates a regional network. The website content and structure suggest a focus on quality and client engagement, with regular news and case studies. The lack of explicit contact details on the homepage may indicate a preference for contact via dedicated pages or forms. The company appears well-positioned with a clear brand identity and digital marketing tools supporting growth and client acquisition.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. Google Analytics is integrated with user consent. However, the absence of explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not publish a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional technical controls and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Include clear and accessible contact information, including security contact channels, to improve business credibility and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Miltton Latvia
Description
Miltton Latvia ir radoša, dinamiska un drosmīga aģentūra, kas sniedz saviem klientiem padomus , kā būt pamanāmiem šajā mainīgajā pasaulē.
Key services
Communication consulting, Crisis communication, Media relations, Branding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.2.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cookiebot, FontAwesome, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by Cookiebot)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management.
  2. Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis with consent.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page URL found but privacy information is embedded in cookie consent and about sections.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML content.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with modern SEO practices via Yoast plugin.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policy found.
  9. Website content is in Latvian with some English language options.
  10. Multiple language versions available via language selector.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, using jQuery 3.2.1 and FontAwesome for UI elements. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and cookie consent is handled by Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with consent. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted third parties. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS uses euronic.fi name servers. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with miltton.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review miltton.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.