Skip to main content

Security report for mikrokirurgija.lv

Latvijas Mikroķirurģijas centrs · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Mikroķirurģijas centrs is a specialized healthcare provider in Latvia offering plastic, reconstructive, hand, and oncological surgery services. The clinic positions itself as a leading microsurgery center with a professional team of certified surgeons and medical staff. Their website is multilingual, targeting local and international patients, and emphasizes patient care, professionalism, and accessibility through online consultation booking and contact forms. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit incident response or security policy pages are found. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust verification, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a healthcare provider but could improve security transparency and WHOIS data availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mikrokirurgija.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on microsurgery and plastic surgery services. It targets patients seeking cosmetic, reconstructive, hand, and oncological surgeries, positioning itself as a leading provider in Latvia. The business model is service-based, relying on expert medical professionals and patient trust. The website features detailed specialist profiles, patient testimonials, and partnerships with insurance and loan providers, indicating a well-established ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by multilingual content and online consultation booking. The absence of public financial or registration data limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners indicating GDPR compliance. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Google and Facebook tools, with moderate user tracking levels. No security.txt or incident response information is published, and security headers like CSP or HSTS are not detected in the HTML source. Forms include honeypot fields to reduce spam. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the source. The security posture is adequate for a healthcare website but could be enhanced by adding security headers, publishing security policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact information for reporting security issues to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to improve domain trustworthiness and support compliance requirements.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Mikroķirurģijas centrs
Description
Latvijas Mikroķirurģijas centrs piedāvā plastiskās ķirurģijas pakalpojumus par pieņemamām cenām | Profesionāla pieeja katram pacientam | Labākie ķirurgi | Konsultācija | +371 67969830
Key services
Kosmētiskā ķirurģija, Rokas ķirurģija, Rekonstruktīvā mikroķirurģija, Onkoloģiskā ķirurģija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Select2, jQuery (implied by plugins), WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional microsurgery and plastic surgery clinic site in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured with multilingual support (LV, EN, RU).
  3. Multiple forms for contact and subscription with honeypot anti-spam fields.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube.
  5. Cookie consent banner and privacy policy present, indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  9. No visible email addresses; contact primarily via phone and forms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It uses Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs like Cloudflare and cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading of images implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the source.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mikrokirurgija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mikrokirurgija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.