Skip to main content

Security report for mijnkinddossier.nl

Mijn Kinddossier · Healthcare · Netherlands

High risk. 20 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mijn Kinddossier is a Dutch healthcare digital portal focused on providing parents access to their children's health data and youth healthcare services. The platform offers functionalities such as questionnaire completion, personalized advice, growth tracking, appointment scheduling, and vaccination record viewing. It integrates DigiD authentication, a trusted Dutch government identity system, enhancing user trust and security. The website is well-branded and targets Dutch parents and youth healthcare organizations, positioning itself as a specialized service in the healthcare sector. Technically, the website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Pickadate, Slick Carousel, Popper.js, Tippy.js, Cropper.js, and Modernizr, built on the Wicket Java web framework. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with a good user experience and clear navigation. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and SEO and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and DigiD authentication, which are positive indicators. A responsible disclosure link is present, showing some security awareness. However, no privacy or cookie policies are found, no contact information is provided, and no security headers are detected, which are gaps in compliance and security best practices. The use of Sentry indicates error tracking but no extensive analytics or tracking is observed. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, explicit security policies, and enhanced transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

20 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mijnkinddossier.nl

This scan found 34 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
55
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mijn Kinddossier operates in the Dutch healthcare sector, specifically targeting youth healthcare organizations and parents. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating with DigiD for secure authentication and offering a centralized portal for child health data management. The business model revolves around providing digital access and interaction tools for healthcare clients, likely funded or supported by healthcare organizations or government entities. The platform's growth potential is tied to expanding youth healthcare digital services and increasing user adoption. Partnerships with DigiD and youth healthcare organizations are critical to its ecosystem. The absence of public business registration or contact details limits external transparency but aligns with a focused healthcare service model.

Security posture

The security posture of Mijn Kinddossier is moderate. The use of HTTPS and DigiD authentication provides a secure foundation for user access. The presence of a responsible disclosure link indicates some level of security governance. However, the lack of published privacy and cookie policies, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response contacts represent compliance and security gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The platform should enhance its security documentation, implement recommended HTTP security headers, and provide clear channels for security incident reporting to improve its security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding structured data and social proof elements to improve trust and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mijn Kinddossier
Description
Mijnkinddossier.nl is an online portal where parents can view and follow the development of their children, including filling questionnaires, reading tailored advice, viewing growth charts, scheduling appointments, viewing vaccination data, and contacting their youth healthcare organization.
Key services
Questionnaire completion, Personalized advice reading, Growth chart viewing, Appointment scheduling, Vaccination data access, Contact with youth healthcare organizations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Pickadate, Slick Carousel, Popper.js, Tippy.js, Cropper.js, Modernizr
Frameworks
Wicket (Java web framework)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of DigiD for authentication
  • Responsible disclosure page linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry (error tracking)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the landing page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are present on the main page.
  4. Use of DigiD authentication indicates integration with Dutch government identity services.
  5. Responsible disclosure link is present, indicating some security awareness.
  6. No visible forms on the landing page; login is via a link to a separate login choice page.
  7. Multiple modern JavaScript libraries used, but no CMS detected.
  8. No social media links or company contact details found.
  9. No security headers information provided; cannot confirm presence.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a Java Wicket framework with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and various UI libraries. The site loads multiple JavaScript libraries for UI components, date/time pickers, tooltips, image cropping, and carousels. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation clarity. However, no CMS or hosting details are evident. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements for security and regulatory compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mijnkinddossier.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mijnkinddossier.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.