Skip to main content

Security report for michlovsky.com

VINSELEKT MICHLOVSKÝ a.s. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vinselekt Michlovský a.s. is a well-established Czech winery with a history dating back to 1993, specializing in the production and sale of various wines including white, red, rosé, sparkling, and bio wines. The company operates an e-commerce platform allowing direct consumer purchases and provides wine tasting experiences. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes age verification to comply with alcohol sales regulations. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some security headers and a published privacy policy, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front but should address privacy and security policy transparency to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching michlovsky.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position in the regional wine market, leveraging its founder's expertise and a sizable vineyard estate. Its business model combines traditional wine production with modern e-commerce sales, targeting adult wine consumers primarily in the Czech Republic. The presence of awards and a dedicated breeding station for grape varieties indicates a competitive advantage in quality and innovation. Partnerships with related wine entities and a professional web presence support growth and customer engagement. The company appears medium-sized with a focused sector in retail and e-commerce of alcoholic beverages. Strategic observations include the need to strengthen digital trust signals and ensure domain registration transparency to avoid reputational risks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and age verification mechanisms for alcohol sales compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published privacy policy reduce the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits readiness for handling security events. The use of third-party scripts and tracking pixels introduces potential privacy concerns that should be managed carefully. Compliance with GDPR is only partially indicated through cookie consent but lacks comprehensive documentation. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor that should be addressed promptly to ensure domain ownership legitimacy and reduce potential phishing or impersonation risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and trustworthiness of domain ownership.
  4. Add explicit incident response and security contact information to improve security readiness and user trust.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with GDPR.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VINSELEKT MICHLOVSKÝ a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VINSELEKT MICHLOVSKÝ a.s.
Description
Vinselekt Michlovský a.s. is a Czech winery established in 1993, managing approximately 125 hectares of vineyards in the Velkopavlovická and Mikulovská subregions. The company offers a variety of wines including white, red, rosé, sparkling wines, and bio wines, and operates an e-shop for direct sales.
Key services
Wine production, E-shop sales, Wine tasting and events, Viticulture and grape breeding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Foxentry (address verification), Modernizr, Respond.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification overlay for alcohol sales
  • Consent management for cookies with denied default consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and e-commerce functionality.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active commercial domain.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  4. Age verification is implemented for alcohol sales compliance.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. No security.txt or incident response contact found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Website content is in Czech language with English language option.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel for sliders, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags, Facebook Pixel for retargeting, and Foxentry for address verification. It employs responsive design techniques and includes mobile optimization. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses asynchronous script loading to improve performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the source. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. The site lacks some modern security headers and a privacy policy, which are technical debts that should be addressed. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with michlovsky.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review michlovsky.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.