Skip to main content

Security report for mf.cz

Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.mf.cz functions primarily as a content recommendation portal, directing visitors to a variety of Czech websites focused on technology, finance, health, software, and media. It aggregates links to specialized sites such as lupa.cz, root.cz, and euro.cz, serving a Czech-speaking audience interested in these sectors. The site’s business model appears to be centered on content aggregation and referral rather than direct content creation or e-commerce. Technically, the site employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap 5 and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user interactions. The site is mobile-optimized and structured with clear navigation, although it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with no evident technical errors. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and does not present privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to verify domain legitimacy and registrant information, reducing trustworthiness. No forms or contact information are present, which limits user engagement and transparency. No adult or explicit content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, the site is functional as a content portal but requires improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence. The lack of WHOIS data and security policies are notable gaps that should be addressed to improve credibility and user confidence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of mf.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mf.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche content aggregator within the Czech Republic, targeting internet users interested in technology, finance, health, and software. Its competitive advantage lies in consolidating multiple specialized Czech websites under one portal, simplifying user access to diverse content. The business model is referral-based, likely generating traffic and potential advertising revenue for partner sites. There is no direct evidence of e-commerce or subscription services. The partnership ecosystem is broad, linking to over twenty related domains, indicating a well-established network. Growth indicators are not visible on the site, and no parent or subsidiary company information is disclosed.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded via HTTPS), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website serves as a portal recommending unique content from various Czech internet servers covering topics such as internet, Linux, IT news, finance, entrepreneurship, health, software, TV series, and automotive.
Key services
Content recommendation, Referral to partner websites
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.0.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a content recommendation portal linking to multiple Czech specialized websites.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  4. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  5. Uses modern Bootstrap framework and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  7. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 5.0.2 for responsive design and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for user tracking. The HTML structure is valid and includes viewport meta tags for mobile optimization. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable from the provided content. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is basic with a single title tag and no meta description or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or hosting provider information. The site could benefit from enhanced SEO metadata, accessibility improvements, and clearer technical documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mf.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mf.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.